0
+2, probably.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the rule of this pattern 9 27 20 60 53 159?
Multiplies by 3, then subtracts 7
What is the rule of n for 3 5 7 9 11?
The simplest is Un = 2n + 1
What is the rule of the pattern 1 2 5 6 9?
add 4 to every other number 1(+4)=5, 5(+4)=9 2(+4)=6
What is the rule for this sequence 3 4 6 9 13 18?
3 4 6 9 13 18...1....2....3....4......5
What rule method of 7 9 11 13 15 17?
t(n) = 5 + 2*n
What is the pattern rule for 3 7 12 18 25 33?
The pattern rule is: 4 5 6 7 8 and so the next number will be 33+9 = 42
What is the rule for pattern 3 - 5 - 7 - 9?
The rule for the pattern is y=x+2. That rule is in the table format in which it would originally be in, but the worded rule would be 'It increases by 2 each time'.
What is the pattern rule for this pattern 2-4-7-9?
+2, +3, +2
What is the rule for the pattern 100 81 64 49 36?
Reducing squares 9 x 9 = 81 8 x 8 = 64 7 x 7 = 49 6 x 6 = 36 so next would be 5 x 5 = 25
What is the rule of this pattern 9 27 20 60 53 159?
Multiplies by 3, then subtracts 7
How do you write a program for triangle pattern 1 3 5 7 5 7 9 11 7 9 11 13?
Use a text-editor.
What is the rule of n for 3 5 7 9 11?
The simplest is Un = 2n + 1
What is the rule of the pattern 1 2 5 6 9?
add 4 to every other number 1(+4)=5, 5(+4)=9 2(+4)=6
What is the rule for this pattern 111359173157?
The rule of this pattern is obfuscated by the omission of spaces, giving the impression that this is the number "111,359,173,157". However, the underlying pattern follows the function of the Fibonacci series, but adding sets of 3 instead of sets of 2. So, 1+1+1=3, 1+1+3=5, 1+3+5=9, 3+5+9=17, 5+9+17=31, 9+17+31=57.
What is the rule for this sequence 3 4 6 9 13 18?
3 4 6 9 13 18...1....2....3....4......5
You have two sets of numbers 2849273234 and 714277383 what will the third set of numbers be?
Unfortunately, the third set could be any numeral(s) at all. To simplify the analysis, look at the following elementary question: Given the series 3, 5, 7, 9 what are the next two numbers? Many people will suggest 11, 13. But the fact is that the problem does not rule out or rule in any series from which the sample 3, 5, 7, 9 could have been taken. Of course, the series could be odd ordinal integers: 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 etc. But it could also be 3, 5, 7, 9, 7, 5, 3, 5, 7, 9, 7.... or 3, 5, 7, 9, 9, 9, 9, 9.... or 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 3, 3, 5, 7, 9, 4, 3, 5, 7, 9....Or any series at all! Problems of this kind require that we make assumptions about the relationships between the numbers. If the test is whether we will make the same assumptions that intelligent people usually make, then there might be a unique solution to the problem. But if there are no stated restraints on the assumptions, then there is no unique solution.
What rule method of 7 9 11 13 15 17?
t(n) = 5 + 2*n
