55 because it is not a multiple of 3
No, they are composite numbers. The factors of 15 are 1, 3, 5, and 15. The factors of 33 are 1, 3, 11, and 33. Prime numbers have two factors: 1 and the number itself, so 15 and 33 cannot be prime.
55 has no 3 factor
Let x = the first number, therefore x + 3 = the second number. x + (x + 3) = 33; 2x + 3 = 33; 2x + 3 -3 = 33 - 3; 2x = 30; 2x/2 = 30/2; x = 15. Hence, the answer is 15 and 18; where 15 + 18 = 33.
55, the rest are divisible by 3
9, 15, 21, 25, 27, 33
The number 22 doesn't belong with 33 and 44 because 33 and 44 are both odd and even numbers, respectively, while 22 is the only even number among them. Additionally, if considering numerical properties, 22 is the only number that is not a multiple of 11, as 33 (3 x 11) and 44 (4 x 11) are both multiples of 11.
Which of these numbers is closest to 500?
You can see that the difference between adjacent numbers is 9, so the numbers are 6, 15, 24, 33, 42, 51, 60, 69, 78, 87 and 87 is the tenth number in the pattern
96 - 14 = 82
The GCF is 3.
3 is a prime number whereas 33 is a composite number.
No, they can have all odd digits, like 9, 15, 33, 35, 39 and so on.