A correlation coefficient can only range from -1.0 to 1.0 so a 50 is not possible. Did you mean .5?
The valid prediction range is the range of the "predictor."
Yes, the predictor variable is placed on the x-axis because the matrix operations used in the method of least squares in linear models require the x-variable be known without error.
Try this website. http://taurus.usask.ca/growthutility/phv_ui.cfm?type=2. The researchers have found a way to predict height for teens who may be early bloomers or late bloomers.
Variables of interest in an experiment (those that are measured or observed) are called response or dependent variables. Other variables in the experiment that affect the response and can be set or measured by the experimenter are called predictor, explanatory, or independent variables. Antisocial behavior
No. But a small sample will be a less accurate predictor of the standard deviation of the population due to its size. Another way of saying this: Small samples have more variability of results, sometimes estimates are too high and other times too low. As the sample size gets larger, there's a better chance that your sample will be close to the actual standard deviation of the population.
No. The correlation between two variables implies that one of them can be predictor of the other. That is, one variable helps to forecast the other and it is not causality.
No. If Factor X is correlated to Factor Y then you can use one as a predictor of the other, but you should never assume that one causes the other (it may, but correlation alone doesn't prove it).Consider the correlation between proximity to a swampland and chances of contracting malaria. Do swamplands cause malaria? No. Malaria is propagated via mosquitoes which of course love to live in swamplands. So your proximity to a swampland is a useful predictor of your chances of contracting malaria, but doesn't cause it.
The best future predictor is the past.
A sole predictor of an event would mean that such predictor is the ONLY factor involved in the fruition of the event
I would say a high percentage of students would qualify just based on IQ tests....like 40-50%.
Party Labels is the most powerful predictor in a congressional voting.
The best predictor is the number of close relatives who suffer from mood disorders.
Victor the Predictor - 1967 TV was released on: USA: 14 September 1967
Victor the Predictor - 1967 - TV was released on: USA: 14 September 1967
Humans.
Dept / earnings ratio.
nothing