I would say zero
Zero is it's own opposite
Zero is the middle. The neutral. There has to be something to separate the positive and the negative.
The opposite of zero - in the sense of additive inverse - is zero.
zero has no opposite * * * * * While it is true that zero has no multiplicative opposite (or inverse), it certainly has an additive inverse, and that is also zero, since 0 + 0 = 0
Zero does not have an opposite * * * * * While it is true that zero has no multiplicative opposite (or inverse), it certainly has an additive inverse, and that is also zero, since 0 + 0 = 0
Zero is not opposite infinity. If all opposites sum to zero than zero+infinity do not. Zero can be difined as (x-x), or two exact opposites. When dividing zero one arrives at 0/x=0 but through algebra 0(0) must = x. When zero is in a finite system (x-x)+x=x One finds that zero retains its self nullifying properties. Yet in divisions and multiplications zero takes on properties other than its own. Groups of zero, or only zero produce something, but when there is something zero keeps self nullification.
Sometimes. The opposite of zero depends on the type of function under consideration. For example, the additive opposite of zero is zero. The multiplicative opposite is not defined.
The additive opposite is itself and its multiplicative opposite is not defined.
A number and its opposite,which add to zero.
It should be zero, but the only problem with that is that you can't divide by zero; so it becomes inconvenient in case the something to the power of zero happens to be in the denominator. Therefore, mathematicians have agreed to let something to the power of zero to always be one just for the sake of convenience.
Zero has no multiplicative opposite (or inverse). However, it has an additive inverse, and that is also zero, since 0 + 0 = 0 The opposite value of a null set would be an infinite set, but infinity is not a real number. The opposite of zero in binary coding is one (on vs. off).
An additive opposite, yes. A multiplicative one, no.