Make a mold of the object and then fill the mold with water and measure the volume of the water.
If the object is irregular the best way is to measure the volume of water it displaces when you immerse it completely in water.
I don't believe there is a way to find the mass of an object knowing only the diameter of the object. If you had the volume, or some other measurements sure. the best bet would be just to weigh it, or find the volume using the principles of displacement.
The answer depends on the object. If the object is of a regular shape the best option would be to measure its dimensions and use geometry to calculate the volume. If the object is small you may be able to find its volume by fluid displacement using a graduated flask (or similar). You will have to find a fluid that does not interact with the object and which is less dense than the object. Fill a graduated flask with the fluid and record the volume. Gently immerse the object and read off the new volume. The difference between the two volume readings will be the volume of the object. Obviously, you will not be able to use water to find the volume of a sugar cube or salt crystals, nor of a block of most kinds of wood. For moderately large objects, you can use two large containers: for example, a bucket and a big tray. Stand the bucket in the tray and fill the bucket to the top with the inert fluid. Then very gently introduce the object into the bucket, collecting the overflowing fluid in the tray. Measure the amount of fluid in the tray using a measuring cylinder or similar. To improve your accuracy, you must lower the object very gently. You can also use additives to reduce the surface tension of the fluid (liquid soap for water). Finally, if the object is big: for example as big as a house, I give up! Challenge your teacher!
Yes. Volume is measured in cubic units.
Simply: Volume (V) is how much space an object takes up whereas density is how "compressed" an objects mass (m) is. Density = m/V Example: Imagine a ton of feathers and a ton of iron. They both have the same mass (weight) but they have different volumes and density.
Volume is the amount of space an object takes up.
If the object is irregular the best way is to measure the volume of water it displaces when you immerse it completely in water.
If the object is irregular the best way is to measure the volume of water it displaces when you immerse it completely in water.
use Archimedis' law- take a known volume of water in a vessel filled upto the brim and immerse the object that you want to measure the volume inside the vessel without giving any pressure and measure the volume of the water overflowed. that will give you the volume of the object(an approximate value)
No. Mass is the amount of matter in an object, essentially how much "stuff" is in it. In 3-dimentional terms, volume is usually the best term for size.
Get some water measure it in mL or L and then put the object in and measure again. Then Subtract them. or Base X Height X Width= Volume
No. Mass is better. The same amount of mass can occupy different volumes.
The best way to find the volume of an irregularly shaped object is to place it in a graduated cylinder full of water or some other liquid, and measure how much the level increased. Since one milliliter is equal to 1 cm3 you simply convert the amount displaced and you have the volume.
the technique depends on kiss purpose
I don't believe there is a way to find the mass of an object knowing only the diameter of the object. If you had the volume, or some other measurements sure. the best bet would be just to weigh it, or find the volume using the principles of displacement.
Finding the volume of many odd shapes is only possible with integral calculus. Google " volume of revolution. "
You can read the measurements wrongly depending on the type of liquid used to measure the volume for irregularly shaped objects. You should determine whether the liquid used forms an upper or lower meniscus. For regularly shaped objects, errors occur when you read the units are rounded off.