answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What would it means if the sampling error was negative?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What would it mean If the sampling error was zero?

The sample consisted of the entire population.


How can one avoid sampling error?

Sampling error cannot be avoided: it is a result of the fact that the sample that you pick for a study will not exactly match the whole population. If there were no variations between the members of the population you would only need to take a sample of size 1 - a single observation would be sufficient.


What would a sampling error of zero mean?

The sampling error is the error one gets from observing a sample instead of the whole population. The bigger it is, the less faith you should have that your sample represents the true value in the population. If it is zero, your sample is VERY representative of the population and you can trust that your result is true of the population.


What is incorrect sampling?

Incorrect sampling is giving account of erroneous information. An example of incorrect sampling is an audit of merchandise in a retail store by an independent person with the risk of human error. A solution to avoiding the risk of incorrect sampling in the audit would be to have a team execute the task so information can be compared.


When could the sampling error be zero?

I believe you are considering the sampling error as calculated from data. I will give you some examples: If you get the exactly same response from all participants in a survey, you will calculate zero sampling error. For example, if I ask 10 people if Obama Barack is the President of the US, I would probably get 10 "yes" responses. Now the answer was well known, so I would expect very few "no" response. If your measurements are not very sensitive or are recorded with a lack of precision, then there can be zero sampling error. For example, I take the body temperature of students at the college and consider any temperature from 97 to 99 degree F to be normal. I find all students in my sample have normal temperatures. So, zero sampling error can occur because a) sample is small, b) variation in response is either non-existent or very small. In theoretical calculations, where sample error is based on the probability distribution of the population, one can calculate for discrete variables, the probability that a sample error will be zero.


Can percent error be negative?

Sometimes you will take the absolute value of the percent error because your estimated number could be less than the theoretical, meaning the calculation is negative. But an absolute value is always positive. A percent error can be left as a negative though, and this would be perfectly acceptable (or even preferred) depending on what you're doing.Answer:In the sciences, a negative percent error indicates a low result. If you have a 0% error, then your observed (lab) result was exactly the same as the theoretical result. A 5% error could mean that your observed result was a little high. A negative percent error is possible; if your observed results were lower than the expected, then you would have a negative percent error. A -5% error could mean that your results were a little low. Having a negative percent error isn't worse than positive percent error -- it could mean the same thing. If you were to have a choice in having a 20% error and a -5% error, the negative percent error is more accurate.


Percent error formula?

Divide the calculated or estimated error by the magnitude of the measurement. Take the absolute value of the result, that is, if it is negative, convert to positive. This would make the percent error = | error / measurement |.


What is the Formula for sampling error related to biostatistics?

I've been looking up the same thing for part of a stats module I do in my nutrition course. This is what I've found - no guarantee it's right but might help a bit. sampling error ∝ 1/√n ∝ means varies directly as so SE = k/√n where k is an unknown constant if we have the size of the sample, n, and the sampling error for one case in a study (which in my question we are given) we can calculate k and get the formula for that study. In my question: for 48 subjects the sample error is 0.3mmol/l. We are asked to find how many subjects would be required to get the sampling error down to 0.1mmol/l. SE = 0.3, n = 48 so 0.3 = k/√48 k = 0.3 * √48 k = 2.078 So in this case, SE = 2.078/√n. K IS NOT ALWAYS GOING TO BE THIS NUMBER!!! You'll need to work it out each time as I dont think it will always be the same. Now work backwards to find n when SE = 0.1mmol/l 0.1 = 2.078/√n √n = 20.78 n = (20.78)2 = 432 So to get a sampling error of 0.1mmol/l we would need 432 subjects. Hope this helps! Jen xx


When would random sampling not be the best approach to sample selection?

When would random sampling not be the best approach to sample selection


When is census necessary instead of sampling?

census is conducted for group data so if it is a sampling data is taken it would lead to lot of non sampling errors


If you feel green around the gills would it be positive or negative?

Negative. It means you feel Noxious or sick.


If repeating an experiment many times with different samples what values for the sample means would be possible?

The answer depends on the population and is described by the sampling distribution of the mean.