Want this question answered?
A survey is used more often than a census because a census requires everybody to respond, while a survey only needs a few people. This means a survey is advantageous for many reasons:It doesn't matter if not everyone responds, you can just survey more people.It is much cheaper to survey than hold a census.It is less effort to hold a survey than hold a census.It takes less time to hold a survey than hold a census.
its better because we often don't have to survey a large population, so a sample is quicker, easier, requires few ressources, little time and can be more accurate if a person is not there to answer it because a sample could represent that person.
It's not.
The rising amount of multiracial people caused the census bureau to allow this in order to better understand the population.
A random sample is better than a census because it takes less time and costs less.
A sample survey may be preferable than a census because it can be more comprehensive. While its research only involves a subset, it is typically more accurate.
A survey is used more often than a census because a census requires everybody to respond, while a survey only needs a few people. This means a survey is advantageous for many reasons:It doesn't matter if not everyone responds, you can just survey more people.It is much cheaper to survey than hold a census.It is less effort to hold a survey than hold a census.It takes less time to hold a survey than hold a census.
becuase it is more accurate.
The census surveys all members of the population. If the objective of the survey is to find representative values of certain attributes, say how much does the average fisherman make in Alaska, then certainly a survey that includes all fisherman should be more accurate. If all members of the population are surveyed, then the resultant summary values would be considered parameters rather than statistics. For example:no statistical inference is made if I state there are 1,000 fisherman in Alaska, and a tally of all of them, shows their average income is $20,000. I can say that a census should be more accurate than a sample survey, provided all other factors are the same and precautions are taken to obtain reliable data. A census conducted in a biased manner will not provide accurate parameters.
why is batching of aggregate by weight is preferable than batching by volume
the census determines the nuber of rep.s for house.
Depends on what kind of fish you ask.
It is because the sample size for the second survey was larger.
It would be something like a census, surveying every last person in a given population rather than taking a random sample.
2010 Census Wyoming population: 563626 2002 Cattle population:1.2 million survey says yes. (had to use 2010 as the only info for 2002 was a forecasted estimate)
Merits: Quicker and cheaper than a census. Demerits: Estimates for population parameters are only approximate. These can be quite poor if sample is unrepresentative.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 18.9 percent of the population of Arkansas have a bachelors degree or higher. This is much lower than the national percentage of 27.2 percent.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey