Only true if both of the numbers are of the same polarity.
positive numbers
The larger number is 1. In the number line, positive numbers are always greater than negative numbers, so 1 is greater than -10. Thus, 1 is the larger of the two numbers.
No, the square of a number is not always larger than the number itself. For positive numbers greater than 1, the square will be larger. However, for numbers between 0 and 1, the square is smaller, and for negative numbers, the square is always positive while the original number is negative, making the square larger in that context as well. Specifically, zero squared is equal to zero.
When multiplying whole numbers, the larger number is always the one that is being multiplied by a number greater than or equal to one. If both numbers are greater than or equal to one, the product will always be larger than both multiplicands. However, if one of the numbers is zero or one, the product will reflect that (resulting in zero or the other number, respectively). Thus, the larger number in the multiplication is context-dependent based on the values used.
Not always, if the smaller number is 0 or a negative number. Then their sum will be equal or less than the greater number.
If you mean "the last number", there is no such thing; you can always add one more. Even infinite numbers - numbers that describe the magnitude of infinite sets - don't have a "last number"; you can always find a larger infinite number. Specifically, if you have a certain infinite number, 2 to the power of that infinite number will give you a larger infinity.
As the need for larger numbers increased, it became necessary to use symbols to group numbers together to form larger numbers. Some examples of number representation are roman numerals as well as unary, binary and decimal code.
You don't always. 2 + 5 = 7, for example. But all prime numbers other than 2 are odd and two odd numbers always equal an even number when added together.
To get the range of a group of numbers you subtract the smaller number from the larger one The mean is the "average" for a group of numbers to get the mean you add all the numbers together. Then divide that number by the number in the group.
No. No matter how large of an example you choose, someone always can find a larger number (of any kind), because the upper range of number is infinite. If you take all the known prime numbers and multiply them together, then add 1 to the result, you will have a number that is not divisible by any of the known prime numbers. This number will either be prime or have prime factors that were not previously known. So, in this way, you can always find a new prime number or a number that is a multiple of new prime numbers. If the known prime numbers include all the prime numbers up to the largest known, the new ones must be larger.
Not quite.When two prime numbers of 3 and higher are added together, the result is always even, because all such prime numbers are odd numbers, and when two odd numbers are added together, the result is always an even number.However 2 is a prime number, and 2 is also an even number. Adding 2 (an even number) to a different prime number (an odd number) will always yield an odd number.Only if you don't include "2".
The square of a number is always two numbers multiplied together. A positive times a positive is always positive, and a negative times a negative is always positive.