Yes, you are.
n+1 (counting the empty string)
You need only a single '1' to write 122, but 122 of them to count to 122.
Counting to a googolplex would take an incomprehensible amount of time. A googolplex is 10 raised to the power of a googol, which itself is 10 raised to the power of 100. The estimated time to count to a googolplex, assuming one count per second, would be significantly longer than the age of the universe. It is a number so large that it is practically impossible to fathom or achieve within any reasonable timeframe.
1s + 1s + 1 = 2s + 1
You, as a programmer, can use a string with 1s and and 0s (or any other content) in each and every programming language.
V.F.D. means a lot of things such as Volunteer Fire Department (the main meaning) wich is divided into a schism, the 1s who start fires (like count olaf) and the 1s who end them( such as the baudelaire parents did before the were killed)
1S+1S+1 = 3 Note that 1 raised to any power is always 1.
8/8
If you mean, count one number a second, why not divide a million by 86400? That's the number of seconds in a day. If you ever forget this number, it is obtained by multiplying 24 x 60 x 60.
davros
There r 16 1s. Including the word one.
5 number 1s so far