Either could be but the conversion from length to area and volume, in terms of units, is simpler.
Area = Length2 and Volume = Length3.
If Area were the base, then
Length = Area0.5 or sqrt(Area) and Volume = Area3/2 - not a convenient relationship.
If Volume were the base, then
Length = Volume1/3 or cubert(Volume) and Area = Volume2/3 - again not a convenient relationship.
Length is required far more often than area or volume in other dirived measures such as speed, acceleration, force, power and so on. So having to calculate roots is making life complicated uncessarily!
The volume is determined by cubing the length of its side.
That will depend on its length which has not been given.
That would depend on its length which has not been given
The answer will depend on which of the two measures is the length and what the other one is: radius or diameter.The answer will depend on which of the two measures is the length and what the other one is: radius or diameter.The answer will depend on which of the two measures is the length and what the other one is: radius or diameter.The answer will depend on which of the two measures is the length and what the other one is: radius or diameter.
This question cannot be answered. First, because the volume of an object cannot be 8000 cm. A centimetre is a measure of length, not of volume and there is no conversion from length to volume. Suppose we assume the volume is 8000 cubic cm. Second, the shape of the object is not specified. It could be a cuboid, or an ellipsoid, a prism, pyramid, cone, cylnder etc or even a hemisphere or some more complex shape. The relationship between the linear dimensions and volume depend on the shape - and in the case of some complex shapes may well require some very high level mathematical techniques. Third, although you can calculate the volume of a shape if you have its height, length and width, if you have only the volume, you cannot calculate the other three.
The volume is determined by cubing the length of its side.
The answer will depend on what characteristic of the thumb you wish to measure: length, width, mass, volume, resistance to pressure, etc.The answer will depend on what characteristic of the thumb you wish to measure: length, width, mass, volume, resistance to pressure, etc.The answer will depend on what characteristic of the thumb you wish to measure: length, width, mass, volume, resistance to pressure, etc.The answer will depend on what characteristic of the thumb you wish to measure: length, width, mass, volume, resistance to pressure, etc.
That will depend on its length which has not been given.
Although length and volume are both physical quantities ,their standard units are different that is for length the standard unit is meter and for volume the standard unit is cubic meter (m3). Also their dimensional formula, for length it is [L] and for volume it is [L]3
That would depend on its length which has not been given
The answer will depend on which of the two measures is the length and what the other one is: radius or diameter.The answer will depend on which of the two measures is the length and what the other one is: radius or diameter.The answer will depend on which of the two measures is the length and what the other one is: radius or diameter.The answer will depend on which of the two measures is the length and what the other one is: radius or diameter.
The answer will depend on the shape of the prism.The answer will depend on the shape of the prism.The answer will depend on the shape of the prism.The answer will depend on the shape of the prism.
No, The volume of the cube would be the length multiplied by the length multiplied by the the length. Volume=Length X Length X Length (of a cube) V=L^3 The proof of this involves some work, but I'm assuming you don't want the proof behind this. http://www.math.com/tables/geometry/volumes.htm
length: metreliquid volume: litremass: kilogramtemperature: Kelvin, although Celcius degrees are also used.
This question cannot be answered. First, because the volume of an object cannot be 8000 cm. A centimetre is a measure of length, not of volume and there is no conversion from length to volume. Suppose we assume the volume is 8000 cubic cm. Second, the shape of the object is not specified. It could be a cuboid, or an ellipsoid, a prism, pyramid, cone, cylnder etc or even a hemisphere or some more complex shape. The relationship between the linear dimensions and volume depend on the shape - and in the case of some complex shapes may well require some very high level mathematical techniques. Third, although you can calculate the volume of a shape if you have its height, length and width, if you have only the volume, you cannot calculate the other three.
The answer will depend on what aspect you want to measure: its mass, length, width, depth, volume etc. And since you have not bothered to provide that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer. The answer will depend on what aspect you want to measure: its mass, length, width, depth, volume etc. And since you have not bothered to provide that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer. The answer will depend on what aspect you want to measure: its mass, length, width, depth, volume etc. And since you have not bothered to provide that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer. The answer will depend on what aspect you want to measure: its mass, length, width, depth, volume etc. And since you have not bothered to provide that crucial bit of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
One of the definitions of "matter" is that it occupies space and possesses rest mass. By this definition, mass is fundamental and since volume is measured in terms of length cubed - both length and volume would also be fundamental (although length really shouldn't be included if you include volume since one is just derived from the other). Temperature, on the other hand is NOT fundamental to matter. Matter can have a temperature, but temperature can also be defined - in a convoluted manner - for a vacuum containing no matter but which has energy passing through it.