Must be conceptual physics as physics has one language and that language is mathematics. I have never known a physicists that was not good at math.
The hypothesis of the question is erroneous. I am good at both Physics and Math. When you get right down to it, you can't be good at Physics for very long without some pretty solid Math.
Yes. It is equally true that some people won't.
Because they are based more on theory than numbers and facts
Yes, it is true. It is also true that some peope who are excellent at math will have a hard time with tieing their shoes and with pole-vaulting. Generally, however, in the majority of cases, most people who are excellent at math will also be quite good with Physics and Chemistry, if they're interested in it and willing to put forth a modicum of effort.
Each person has an individual learning style, and just because math and science tend to go hand in hand, that doesn't mean that people will automatically excel in both subjects.
Generally the opposite is true as chemistry and physics are heavily mathematically based
trigonometry, physics, calculus, algebra, etc. lots of math. good luck.
Not at at all, both fields are mathematics heavy.
You can't be good a everything.
physics attempts (and does a good job) to describe events observed in nature. Physics uses mathematics for some of the explanation. Gravitational attraction described by Newton used a math equation.
That's hard to believe, unless it's conceptual science, then people need to be good at math to learn science
Because math, physics, chemistry and computer science are not the same things. Just because you're good at using maths doesn't necessarily mean you're not good at applying them. Theoretical and applied mathematics are widely considered very different fields.