answersLogoWhite

0

Each person has an individual learning style, and just because math and science tend to go hand in hand, that doesn't mean that people will automatically excel in both subjects.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why are some people good at math but bad at physics?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

Why are some people good at only math but horrible at physics chemistry and the social sciences?

Because they are based more on theory than numbers and facts


Why is it that some people who are good at math are bad at programming?

You can't be good a everything.


Why are some people good at mathematics but bad at physics chemistry computer science and engineering?

Because math, physics, chemistry and computer science are not the same things. Just because you're good at using maths doesn't necessarily mean you're not good at applying them. Theoretical and applied mathematics are widely considered very different fields.


Why students who are good in math are not good in English?

Because of the way the brain works, some people are good at both, and some are good at one but not the other


Why is it that some people who are good at math have bad writing skills?

Given these two characteristics, there are four possibilities: Some people are good at math and have bad writing skills. Some people are good at math and have good writing skills. Some people are bad at math and have good writing skills. Some people are bad at math and have bad writing skills. Leaving aside what it means to be "good" or "bad" at these disciplines, it is likely that these groups of people have varying amounts of genetic predisposition for success at these aptitudes and their environments provided varying amounts of support or resistance to help them fulfill their levels of achievement. If you're suggesting a causal relationship, that to be "good" at one necessarily implies being "bad" at another, I don't think such generalizations are useful.