The very existence of a shadow is dependent on light. the rock group with the title ( Shadows of Knight) was something of a contradiction though they meant an armored warrior. In other words a certain amount of light is required to produce a shadow. This knocks out a number of popular stories of someone walking home in (always) deserted or poorly lighted streets being guided by a shadow. analyze the facts it does not work out! In astronomy- an object at the zenith- ninety degrees elevation- or Twelve O'clock high- does not cast a shadow. there are a number of technical factors of interest to artists and photographers.. but I cannot get into them in this narrow compass.
The length of the shadow is proportional to the height of the post. Thus, if l is the length of the unknown shadow, l/17 = 1.2/5 or l = 4.1 feet. This should be rounded to 4 if the value 5 is not considered to be known to at least two significant digits.
Proportional is when it is proportional.
Designate the unknown shadow length by s. Shadows cast at the same time and place are proportional to the height of the object casing the shadow. Therefore: 4/6 = s/21, or s = [4(21)]/6 = 14 feet.
A is proportional to C4.
It is an expression, not an equation and so cannot be proportional nor non-proportional.
Shadow lengths are proportional to the heights of objects casting the shadows. Therefore, calling the shadow length l, the height h, and the proportionality constant k, l = kh. (The intercept is 0 because an object with no height casts no shadow.) Therefore, in this instance k = l/h = 6/3 or 8/4 = 2. then l(6) = 2 X 6 = 12 feet.
The length of the shadow at any moment is proportional to the height of the object casting the shadow. call the unknown height of the tree h, then, h/7 = 0.9/2, or h = 7(0.9)/2 = 3 m, to the justified number of siginifcant digits, or 3.15 m if the single digit numbers given are all considered to be exact.
Directly proportional relationship is F=ma, F is directly proportional to a. Inversely proportional relationship is v=r/t, v is inversely proportional to t.
The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.The gravity is proportional to both masses involved, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance.
Disproportional.If instead you're looking for the antonym of directly proportional, that would be inversely proportional.
Directly proportional. Greater speed - greater distance.
Your question is incomplete... proportional to WHAT?