Best Answer

Because rational numbers aren't able to be notated precisely in decimal form. They don't stop.

Q: Why might you need to be able to estimate an irrational numbers?

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

If you want to use a rational number for a mathematical operation, it will be necessary to estimate it for a numerical outcome. Irrational numbers can't be written out exactly.

Irrational numbers are not able to be formed from a simple ratio or fraction.The root word behind rational is the word Ratio, the relationship of two numbers. Their ratio.Pi and e would be common irrational numbers, as is 2^0.5

No, integers aren't irrational numbers. For a number to be irrational, it must not be able to be expressed as a fraction of two integers. Every integer can be expressed as the integer itself divided by one, and so fails to meet this requirement. For example, 2 can be expressed as 2/1; therefore, it is a rational number as opposed to an irrational number.

The only number I seem to be able to find is: * 1 Unless one wants to use rational and irrational numbers. That is a different story.

Normal fractions are rational numbers. So you might not be able to share things without rationals.

Related questions

If you want to use a rational number for a mathematical operation, it will be necessary to estimate it for a numerical outcome. Irrational numbers can't be written out exactly.

Irrational numbers are not able to be formed from a simple ratio or fraction.The root word behind rational is the word Ratio, the relationship of two numbers. Their ratio.Pi and e would be common irrational numbers, as is 2^0.5

No, integers aren't irrational numbers. For a number to be irrational, it must not be able to be expressed as a fraction of two integers. Every integer can be expressed as the integer itself divided by one, and so fails to meet this requirement. For example, 2 can be expressed as 2/1; therefore, it is a rational number as opposed to an irrational number.

No irrational numbers don't have patterns and cant be expressed as a ratio so you cant even subtract the number. Ex: 22/7 - sqrt(2), you wont be able to find the difference since you cant even put it in a complete number.

A rational number is able to be represented as a ratio of polynomials. pi/e is a ratio of irrational numbers, neither of which can be represented as a ratio of polynomials, and so I would conclude that pi/e is not rational. But it's a good question, because what if two irrational numbers could cancel out their irrationality, like two negative numbers! A quotient of two irrational numbers can be a rational number. Trivial example 2pi/pi = 2.

Some less able students are not at ease when working with irrational numbers. Overall, though, the advantages far outweigh that prejudice/disadvantage.

The only number I seem to be able to find is: * 1 Unless one wants to use rational and irrational numbers. That is a different story.

Ask the dealers or got to the website. They might be able to help you out.

You cannot. The diagonal of a unit square cannot be represented by a rational number. However, because rational numbers are infinitely dense, you can get as close to an irrational number as you like even if you cannot get to it. If this approximation is adequate than you are able to represent the real world using rational numbers.

Normal fractions are rational numbers. So you might not be able to share things without rationals.

It's generally more effective to address the behavior or statements directly without labeling them as irrational. You can ask questions to understand their perspective and gently point out any possible inconsistencies in their reasoning to help guide the conversation towards a more rational approach.

If data has been published, you might be able to find out the date made and specific model.