324 is a perfect square of 18. But it's not a perfect cube.
No. If the square root of 98 was an integer, 98 would be a perfect square.
No, it is not. For it to be a perfect square, the square root of it would have to be an integer, but √120 ≈ 10.954. 100 and 121 are perfect squares nearest to 120. ■
No it is not. 22 is not a perfect square because it is not a product of a rational number multiplied by itself. The closest perfect square would be 25
No it is not. 22 is not a perfect square because it is not a product of a rational number multiplied by itself. The closest perfect square would be 25
I think you mean Perfect Square. If so, an example would be 9. It is a perfect square because it can be square root to 3.
No but it is a perfect square number because its square root is 13
then you would have a perfect square
You would need to cut 4 matchsticks to create a perfect square.
you can multiply two whole numbers together to get that. if you use graph paper, you could make a perfect square. the area of that square is called a perfect square because you can make a perfect square using that many units as the area. for example 4x4=16, so 16 would be the perfect square.
That would be 25 . In fact, 25 is the onlyfactor of 75 that's a perfect square.
To draw a flowchart to check if a number is a perfect square, you would start with a start/end symbol. Then, you would input the number to be checked. Next, you would use a decision symbol with a condition to check if the square root of the number is an integer. If it is, the flowchart would output that the number is a perfect square; if not, it would output that the number is not a perfect square. Finally, you would end the flowchart.
I have never before heard of a non-perfect square but I suppose it would be any non-zero number that is not the square of an integer. People sometimes say "perfect square" to mean an integer that is a square of an integer - I think the "perfect" is redundant but if you do not think "square" is clear by itself, say "integer square."