Jael Allen
324 is a perfect square of 18. But it's not a perfect cube.
Dream
No. If the square root of 98 was an integer, 98 would be a perfect square.
No it is not. 22 is not a perfect square because it is not a product of a rational number multiplied by itself. The closest perfect square would be 25
No, it is not. For it to be a perfect square, the square root of it would have to be an integer, but √120 ≈ 10.954. 100 and 121 are perfect squares nearest to 120. ■
I think you mean Perfect Square. If so, an example would be 9. It is a perfect square because it can be square root to 3.
No it is not. 22 is not a perfect square because it is not a product of a rational number multiplied by itself. The closest perfect square would be 25
then you would have a perfect square
No but it is a perfect square number because its square root is 13
you can multiply two whole numbers together to get that. if you use graph paper, you could make a perfect square. the area of that square is called a perfect square because you can make a perfect square using that many units as the area. for example 4x4=16, so 16 would be the perfect square.
That would be 25 . In fact, 25 is the onlyfactor of 75 that's a perfect square.
I have never before heard of a non-perfect square but I suppose it would be any non-zero number that is not the square of an integer. People sometimes say "perfect square" to mean an integer that is a square of an integer - I think the "perfect" is redundant but if you do not think "square" is clear by itself, say "integer square."
No, a perfect square is the square of an integer number. Fractions are never a perfect square, as the square of an integer is always another integer.Actually fractions can be perfect squares an example is one ninth, it would be one third times one third which equals one ninth.
If you mean as a factor, that would be 4.