I have never before heard of a non-perfect square but I suppose it would be any
non-zero number that is not the square of an integer.
People sometimes say "perfect square" to mean an integer that is a square of an integer - I think the "perfect" is redundant but if you do not think "square" is clear by itself, say "integer square."
no 17 is a non-perfect square
It can be. 7 is a non-perfect square and, being an integer, it is rational.
the perfect square is a number that can muliply by its self to equeal its self.
Yes, just take its square root. Since it is an integer, 64 is a perfect square. Alternately, since the square of this integer is 64, 64 is a perfect square, by definition.
No.1/4 is not a perfect square but its square roots are +/- 1/2 which are rational.
It is the definition of a perfect square.
no 17 is a non-perfect square
No. 2.25 = 1.5^2 is a non-perfect square but it is rational.
Any integer multiplied by itself results in a perfect square.
It can be. 7 is a non-perfect square and, being an integer, it is rational.
It is not a perfect square.
It is not a perfect square.
the perfect square is a number that can muliply by its self to equeal its self.
non perfect square is that it cannot be divided by any of the number . It is divided by only itself and one
The question is based on a total misunderstanding. For example, 5 is a non-perfect square but 5 is not irrational!
A perfect square is the square of an integer. For example, 1 (which is 12), 4 (22) or 9 (32) etc...
No. 2.25 is not a perfect square but it is rational.