x = the width of the path.
A = area of path = (15+x)(11+x) - (15*11) = (15*11)+15x+11x-(15*11) = 15x+11x = 26x
192 ft2 = 26x
x = 192/26 ~= 7.38 feet.
The volume of a beaker does not provide enough information about its dimensions. It could be thin and tall or squat and short.
Information about area is not enough to determine its dimensions. You can, for example, double its length and halve its width without altering the area.
if we are talking about memory in a computer,it is about 0.0000210GB im not cleaver enough to work out the exact amount but it is close enough for computer talk
Since there are 4 lengths given, the shape could be a quadrilateral. Unfortunately, the lengths of the sides is not enough information to determine the shape of a quadrilateral. As an illustration, consider a square of sides 10 cm. Its area is 100 cm2. But it can be "distorted" into a rhombus with the same sides but the area can be reduced to as close to 0 as you like. Four linear measures could also mean that it is a 4-dimensional cuboid in hyperspace or some other shape in 2 or 3 dimensions. But since these shapes cannot be determined, it is not possible to find an answer to the question.
There is not enough information to answer the question.
You cannot. There is not enough information.
The area of a rug does not provide enough information to determine its dimensions. For a start, it is not even possible to determine the shape of the rug: circular, oval, square, rectangular or some other shape.
The area of a shape does not provide enough information to determine its dimensions. First of all, there is no reason to assume that the area is rectangular in shape. Second, even if it were rectangular, it could be square or extremely long and very narrow.
The area of a plot of land is not enough information to determine its dimensions. First of all, there is no justification for assuming that the shape is rectangular. It could be circular, triangular or even irregular. Even if you know that it is rectangular you still do not have enough information to determine its dimensions. Double the length, halve the width and the area remains the same. Or treble the length, reduce the width to a third - same result. There are infinitely more options
The volume of a rectangular prism does not provide enough information to determine its dimensions. It could, for example by 1 cm * 1 cm * 360 cm or 1 cm * 10 cm * 36 cm or 10 cm * 10 cm * 3.6 cm These are just a few of the infinitely many possible answers.
Imagine the uniform width be "x" now the total area (area of the garden + area of border) - (area of the garden) = 430 so ((14+x)(19+x)) - (14*19) = 430 x = 10 so the width will be 10 feet uniform around the garden
There is not enough information to uniquely identify the dimensions.There is not enough information to uniquely identify the dimensions.There is not enough information to uniquely identify the dimensions.There is not enough information to uniquely identify the dimensions.
There is not enough information to calculate the dimensions.
The area of a parallelogram does not provide enough information to determine its dimensions.
The volume of the prism (not prisim) depends on its shape. Information about the dimensions (not demensions) is not enough without knowing the shape of the cross section: circular, triangular, rectangular etc.
It seems that our Universe has 10 or 11 dimensions. But only 4 of those dimensions (1 time dimension, 3 space dimensions) are large enough to be noticed.
It is approx 65 square metres. The area of a room does not provide enough information to determine its dimensions partly because nothing is known about its shape and also, if a rectangular, it could be a square or a very long, very thing shape.