0
Can a three-dimensional object may be built from two-dimensional objects?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Not really.
You can imagine a 3-d object being made up of a lot of 2-d objects stacked on top of one another. But remember that, by definition, a 2-d object has no thickness (or, in this case, height).
Height of one 2-d obect = 0
so height of n such objects = n*0 = 0
So a stack, no matter how many objects you use, will remain 0. And so you are not building up a 3-d object.
Alternatively, you could imagine a cube (3-d) being built up from 6 square faces (2-d). Except that this is just the shell of the 3-d object, not the 3-d object itself.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How are parallel lines used in real life?
Most houses are built with walls parallel to each other.
What is the difference between a transcendental an algebraic function?
An algebraic function is a function built from polynomial and combined with +,*,-,/ signs. The transcendental it is not built from polynomial like X the power of Pie plus 1. this function is transcendental because the power pi is not integer number in result it can't be a polynomial.
If 25 men can build a house for 18 days how many days can 15 men built?
30 days.
What is difference between regular expression and regular definition in compiler?
Regular expression is built in and the regular definition has to build from regular expression........
Is 5x an algebraic expression?
yes, 5x is a expression. A expression in algebra does not contain a = sign. a = sign means its an equation. A algebraic equation is built out of expressions.
What is the smaller object that are built to represent the detail of larger objects?
The smaller objects which are built to represent the larger objects are called Model
What is a small object usually built to scale that represents in detail another often larger object?
The smaller objects which are built to represent the larger objects are called Model
A three-dimensional object cannot be built from two-dimensional objects.?
false
Sorting an array of objects through in built function?
Object[] arrayToBeSorted; Arrays.sort(arrayToBeSorted);
A three dimensional object cannot be built from two dimensional objects?
That's more of a statement than a question. It's also a false statement. You can build a three dimensional object from two dimensional objects, if you have an infinite number of them.
What are direct objects indirect objects predicate nominatives predicate adjectives?
Direct objects receive the action of the verb.Carl built a house. (a house is the direct object)Indirect objects receive the direct object.Martha handed me her hat. (her hat is the direct object; me is the indirect object)Predicate nominatives and predicate adjectives follow a linking verb and rename or describe the subject.Carl is a carpenter. (a carpenter is the predicate nominative)Martha is happy. (happy is the predicate adjective)
A three-dimensional object cannot be built from two-dimensional objects?
false Actually, the statement is true. You can imagine a 3-d object being made up of a lot of 2-d objects stacked on top of one another. But remember that, by definition, a 2-d object has no thickness (or, in this case, height). Height of one 2-d obect = 0 so height of n such objects = n*0 = 0 So a stack, no matter how many objects you use, will remain 0. And so you are not building up a 3-d object. Alternatively, you could imagine a cube (3-d) being built up from 6 square faces (2-d). Except that this is just the shell of the 3-d object, not the 3-d object itself.
What subatomic particles move from the surface of objects when friction occurs?
Electrons. That is how static charge is built. Some of the electrons of one object move to the other, creating a negative charge where the electrons have built up, and a positive charge where the electrons have vacated.
A three-dimensional object may be built from two-dimensional objects?
true You can imagine any 3 dimensional shape as stacking the 2 dimensional version of that shape on top of each other. Actually, it is false. You can imagine a 3-d object being made up of a lot of 2-d objects stacked on top of one another. But remember that, by definition, a 2-d object has no thickness (or, in this case, height). Height of one 2-d obect = 0 so height of n such objects = n*0 = 0 So a stack, no matter how many objects you use, will remain 0. And so you are not building up a 3-d object. Alternatively, you could imagine a cube (3-d) being built up from 6 square faces (2-d). Except that this is just the shell of the 3-d object, not the 3-d object itself.
What is the procedure to built a class and object in visual basic?
whate is the procedure to built a class and object in visual basic.?
How many 1970 440 roadrunners were built?
[object Object]
Why java is not purely object oriented programming language?
Java IS a pure OOP language. All types, including the built-in types, are implemented as objects.
