Irrational numbers can be graphed at a number line, but only as an estimation.
Yes.
Yes irrational numbers are real numbers that are part of the number line,
None, since 57 is NOT an irrational number.
The one thing they have in common is that they are both so-called "real numbers". You can think of them as points on the "real number line".Both are infinitely dense, in the sense that between any two rational numbers, you can find another rational number. The same applies to the irrational numbers. Thus, there are infinitely many of each. However, the infinity of irrational numbers is a larger infinity than that of the rational numbers.
Irrational numbers can be graphed at a number line, but only as an estimation.
The same as you would a rational number. Its distance from zero will represent the number, whether it is rational or irrational.
No. The real number line corresponds to rational AND irrational numbers.
Yes.
yes
Yes, they completed the [Real] number line.
Real numbers can be rational or irrational because they both form the number line.
Yes irrational numbers are real numbers that are part of the number line,
Yes, every irrational number is also a real number. Real numbers include all the numbers on the number line, which consists of both rational and irrational numbers. Rational numbers can be expressed as fractions, whereas irrational numbers cannot be expressed as simple fractions. So, while all irrational numbers are real numbers, not all real numbers are irrationalโsome are rational.
Irrational numbers are real numbers because they are part of the number line.
Yes. In fact, a number line would be full of an uncountably many infinite number of discontinuities (holes) without them and hence would not be a line, so in fact irrational numbers MUST be placed on the number line in order for it to exist.
That would be the real numbers.