0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is equivalent to ln 6 plus ln 4?
You can also write this as ln(6 times 4)
What is the average rate of change from x equals 2 to x equals 3 for the function f of x equals 3 ln x?
It is 1.2164
Given the formula k equals lmn what is the formula for m?
m = k/ln
How do you solve 3e to the power 2x -1 equals 8?
you need to know natural logarithms3e to the 2x-1 power = 8(2x-1) ln e = ln (8/3)ln e = 1(2x-1) = ln(8/3) = 0.982x = 1.98x = 0.99
What adds up to -4 and multiplies to -2?
-6
Find LN Round the answer to the nearest tenth?
LM = 4 in LN = ? Find LN. Round the answer to the nearest tenth.
How would you solve ln 4 plus 3 ln x equals 5 ln 2?
Ln 4 + 3Ln x = 5Ln 2 Ln 4 + Ln x3= Ln 25 = Ln 32 Ln x3= Ln 32 - Ln 4 = Ln (32/4) = Ln 8= Ln 2
Ailments of the neurons?
ln/mkl;m;/lm;lok
How do you solve ln 5 plus ln x equals 1?
5 + (-4) = 1 x = -4
How do you work out Ln 24 - ln x equals ln 6?
18
Mn equals 92 lm equals?
9\6
How do you solve 3 ln x - ln 2 equals 4?
3lnx - ln2=4 lnx^3 - ln2=4 ln(x^3/2)=4 (x^3)/2=e^4 x^3=2e^4 x=[2e^4]^(1/3)
A person with with the blood group genotype lmln has phenotype mn what is the relationship between the lm and ln?
codominance
Why do the Lucas numbers use L1 equals 2 and L2 equals 1 and not L1 equals 1 and L2 equals 2 I have explain with logical reasoning and relevant calculations?
If L1=1 and L2=2, we would just get the Fibonacci sequence. Recall that the Fibonacci sequence is recursive and given by: f(0)=1, f(1)=1, and f(n)=f(n-1)+f(n-2) for integer n>1. Thus, we have f(2)=f(0)+f(1)=1+1=2. If L1=1 and L2=2 then we would have L1=f(1) and L2=f(2). Since the Lucas numbers are generated recursively just like the Fibonacci numbers, i.e. Ln=Ln-1+Ln-2 for n>2, we would have L3=L1+L2=f(1)+f(2)=f(3), L4=f(4), etc. You can use complete induction to show this for all n: As we have already said, if L1=1 and L2=2, then we have L1=f(1) and L2=f(2). We now proceed to induction. Suppose for some m greater than or equal to 2 we have Ln=f(n) for n less than or equal to m. Then for m+1 we have, by definition, Lm+1=Lm+Lm-1. By the induction hypothesis, Lm+Lm-1=f(m)+f(m-1), but this is just f(m+1) by the definition of Fibonnaci numbers, i.e. Lm+1=f(m+1). So it follows that Ln=f(n) for all n if we let L1=1 and L2=2.
How do you write ln a equals 5.3 in exponential form?
ln(a) = 5.3 a = e5.3
What is the distance of the line LMN with segments LM equals 3x and MN equals 2x plus 2?
LMN = LM + MN = 3x + (2x +2) = 5x + 2
Mn equals 72 ln equals?
14\2
