answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

-98

User Avatar

Ramona Kling

Lvl 10
3y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

look at 1+3=4=2^2

1+3+5=9=3^2

1+3+5+7=16=4^2

The sum of the first n odd numbers is n^2!

Now how many are there?

look at 1-9 inclusive.. 1,3,5,7,9 there are 5

1-19-...there are 10 which is 20/2

so 1-99 should be 50 of them and the answer should be 50^2=2500

Think the young Euler's way:

-How many integer numbers are there from 1 to 100 inclusive? 100.

-How many of them are the odds and how many are the evens? 50 and 50.

So, from 1 to 100 inclusive there are 50 odds: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, ..., ..., ... , 95, 97 and 99.

Take them added together:

1 + 3 + 5 + 7 + 9 +11+13+...+93+95+97+99 (50 odds in total)

99+97+95+93+91+89+87+...+ 7+ 5 + 3 + 1 (50 odds in total)

Add the vertical pairs and their sums together:

(1+99)+(3+97)+(5+95)+(7+93)+(9+91)+...+(97+3)+(99+1).

-You can see that every pair added in each brachet gives 100 as a sum.

-How many pairs in brachets were added? 50 pairs.

So, since each pair gives 100 as a sum and there are 50 pairs in total, we take a total sum of 50x100=5000. But we took TWICE all the (50) odd numbers from 1 to 99 inclusive in order to add them in equal-summing pairs. So, we took TWICE their sum found out to be 5000. Then, their (single) sum must be 5000:2=2500.

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are all of the odd numbers from 1-99 inclusive added together?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Algebra

What two numbers add to get 19 and multiply to get 180?

199


How many 3-digit numbers containing at least one digit of 7?

-4


What is formula for solving a transposition problem please read discussion for the actual problem?

Here's the problem as you posed it: : A woman goes to the bank to cash a check. The bank teller makes a mistake. She transposes the dollars and cents, and gives the woman way too much. On the way home, the woman loses $0.02 through a hole in the bottom of her purse. She now has exactly twice the face value of the original check. (We're assuming here that she had no money when she went to the bank.) : I already know the answer to this question. The answer is $32.65 (and $65.32), but that is not what I want here. What I want to know is how would you solve this problem without just trying numbers all day until you accidentally hit on the answer? Let D = correct number of dollars and C = correct number of cents So, if we work in cents: * 100D + C was the correct amount of money. * 100C + D was the amount given in error.We can write: (100C + D) - 2 = 2(100D + C) which will simplify... 100C + D - 2 = 200D + 2C to this: 98C = 199D + 2 We have here two variables and only one equation, so we cannot find the solution directly. However, for the problem to make sense D and C must be two-digit integers (whole numbers) and this condition will enable us to solve it. We need to consider exactmultiples of 98 and of 199. * N.B. 2 x 98 is 196. 196 is three less than 199. Therefore every time we increase C by two, the next multiple of 199 will climb 3 further away. Just to illustrate this: * 2 x 98 = 196 = 1 x 199 - 3 * 4 x 98 = 392 = 2 x 199 - 6 * 6 x 98 = 588 = 3 x 199 - 9* 8 x 98 = 784 = 4 x 199 - 12We want our multiple of 98 to be 2 higher than the nearest multiple of 199; so the previous multiple of 98 would have been 96 lower: C x 98 = D x 199 + 2 Subtract 98 from this: (C - 1) x 98 = D x 199 - 96Look back to the examples above, taking in the pattern, and you will appreciate that this equation will be satisfied when D = 96/3* = 32, and C - 1 = 64. Therefore D = 32 and C = 65; the amount was $32.65. That method was not of course a formula; it was more of an algorithm to speed up the process of guessing a bit. Thanks for the interesting question! *We were fortunate here that 96/3 turned out to be a whole number, bringing us swiftly to a solution.


How many different division problems can you solve with the 10 x 10 multiplication table if you do not include problems with a dividend of 0?

199


How many whole numbers use exactly 2 digits?

If you choose to include 0 as a whole number (debatable it is only theoretical and not existent) then 99 (01, 02, 03...) but if you include 00 then it is 100. If you wish to include negative numbers as these also are only two digits then it is 199 (assuming you included 00, if not then 198). But even after all of that and you didn't include 01, 02... and -01, -02... then it would be 180. And finally, 0 is another answer because 0000036.00000000000000 is still a whole number but has an infinite number of zeros on the end and in front of the '36'. There is a complex answer to a simple question, enjoy!