Water
Well is a transitive verb when used to mean to rise, spring, or gush, as water or oil from the earth or some other source.
Well simply it is a new source of oil/gas, that we have plenty of. It will mean that when we run out of oil from traps (the current way to get oil) we will have enough oil and gas to last us another 50 or more years (this is an estimate and to be truthful we still have know idea how much oil is available from fracking). Fracking will open up a load of new jobs. However this will just replace the old jobs of conventional oil/gas extraction. At first fracking will make oil and gas cheaper in the market. This is because if there is more oil there is less demand for it so prices go down. However when oil from fracking runs out, then we will be back at the same step as we are now. Fracking is not as bad as people make it out to be - if it is monitored and regulated. The only problem is who is going to do that, because at the moment it is done by the fracking companies. Do we know if they are telling the truth? For them profit is more important than the environment. However in my opinion I am still against fracking. And it is not water pollution and earthquakes that bother me but the environmental horizon if we choose to take the path of fracking (continuing to do fracking in America or starting to frack in the UK). The oil and gas from fracking is the same as it is from conventional oil extraction methods. I believe that fracking will become another excuse to look away from turning to eco-friendly energy sources. Fracking may become another short term cop-out for the government's energy crisis but in the long term it is just destroying the environment with global warming. Sorry if the last question was off topic but I wanted to give another view to the truth of fracking.
is when on a graph the dots are close together (Not quite.)answ2. Correlation is the amount of a phenomenon which may be explained by one of the variables.When plotted on a graph, if the data formed a straight line with no outlying points, that would illustrate a high degree of correlation. (between the x and y axes.)If there were considerable scatter of your points from a line, then the correlation would be weak.If for example I plotted the height of a class of boys, against their ages, I would expect a good correlation. In other words, a large amount of the variability in height could be explained by the age variable.
oil deposits
meowing
Well, it depends on your experiment. If you're adjusting the amount of cooking oil before an experiment, it's an independent variable. If you're calculating how much there is after the experiment, it would be a dependent variable.
water and if they mix
Water is faster by it's lower viscosity, though oil viscosity is more temperature dependent than that of water.
Oil will not mix with water.
Currently, very dependent.
Water on bottom, oil on top and glycerin between them.
The automobile industry, for one, is heavily dependent on oil.
Between 12,000 and 20,000 miles, dependent on various factors.
One is in water and one is in oil You don't blanch in oil, that would be deep frying.
The Persian Gulf or the eastern Mediterranean's economy is most dependent on the export of oil.
The Persian Gulf or the eastern Mediterranean's economy is most dependent on the export of oil.
This question does not have enough information. If you put oil and water in a jar and shake it, the oil and water would not mix. There is a fine line between the two.