0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do you write a unit rate of a ratio?
Find an equivalent ratio so that the denominator = 1. This may require the numerator to be a fraction.
Step in simplifying numerical expression?
Step 1Practice doing addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division quickly in your head. About 1/3 of the math questions on the PCAT require you to simplify numerical expressions or solve simple word problems involving proportions. You won't have time to work out all of these problems slowly on paper. The more you can do in your head, the better you quantitative subscore will be.Now, second Step is: Review basic concepts of pre-calculus, focusing on functions. What is the limit behavior of a polynomial, exponential, or rational function? What do graphs of these functions look like? Review polynomial factoring as well.Step 3Review basic single variable calculus, focusing on derivatives and integrals. Polynomials, exponential functions, and rational functions will be tested on PCAT calculus.Step 4Don't worry about geometry, as this will not be tested. You may see a few questions that test your knowledge of sine, cosine, and tangent as functions.Step 5Learn to spot wrong answers at a glance. Each PCAT math question only has 4 choices, so if two (or three!) look wrong to you automatically, you'll be in good shape.
How do you solve fractional equations?
Provided that none of the denominators is 0 over their domains, the answer is quite simple. Multiply each term in the equation by the Least Common Multiple (LCM) of all the denominators and then simplify. Yo wil have an equation that is free of fractions. If that is not the case then things get much more complicated. You need to establish whether the numerator or denominator tends to zero faster. You are now in the territory of limiting values or orders of magnitude. The nature of your question suggests that you do not require an explanation of these concepts.
Why whole numbers require an extension?
as whole numbers does not contain negative numbers, so for denoting ( eg: deapth of the sea,etc )negative things they require an extension.
Why are square units used when working with a three dimensional figure?
Because the surface areas of 3-d figures are two-dimensional and their measures require square units.Because the surface areas of 3-d figures are two-dimensional and their measures require square units.Because the surface areas of 3-d figures are two-dimensional and their measures require square units.Because the surface areas of 3-d figures are two-dimensional and their measures require square units.
How is doing operations with rational expressions similar or different from doing equations with fractions and how can they be used in real life?
How is doing operations (adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing) with rational expressions similar to or different from doing operations with fractions?If you know how to do arithmetic with rational numbers you will understand the arithmetic with rational functions! Doing operations (adding, subtracting, multiplying, and dividing) is very similar. When you areadding or subtracting they both require a common denominator. When multiplying or dividing it works the same for instance reducing by factoring. Operations on rational expressions is similar to doing operations on fractions. You have to come up with a common denominator in order to add or subtract. To multiply the numerators and denominators separated. In division you flip the second fraction and multiply. The difference is that rational expressions can have variable letters and powers in them.
Which operations don't require a common denominator?
Addition and subtraction are the only fraction operations that need a common denominator. Multiplication, division, and exponents do not need a common denominator. In fact, it is best to use reduced fractions otherwise it gets very messy.
How do you convert a rational number into a decimal?
The line in a fraction can be read as "divided by." 4/5 = 4 divided by 5 = 0.8
How do you write 0.375 as a fraction?
0.375 is a fraction. It is a fraction in decimal form rather than in the form of a ratio. However, that does not stop it being a fraction. Its equivalent, in rational form, is 375/1000. You can simplify this rational fraction if you require.
Why do you have to find a common denominator?
Addition or subtraction of fractions require "like" fractions: that is, fractions with the same denominator.
Why rational numbers require extension?
Because numbers such as pi, e and the square root of 2 are not rational.
What about rational functions creates undefined and asymptotic behavior?
A rational function is the ratio of two polynomial functions. The function that is the denominator will have roots (or zeros) in the complex field and may have real roots. If it has real roots, then evaluating the rational function at such points will require division by zero. This is not defined. Since polynomials are continuous functions, their value will be close to zero near their roots. So, near a zero, the rational function will entail division by a very small quantity and this will result in the asymptotic behaviour.
Does Simplifying some radical expressions require you to combine the rules of multiplication and division?
true
Processors that require one voltage for external operations and another for internal operations are called?
Dual Voltage
Why do processors require large amounts of money for their operations?
Interangency
Why is it the best to use the LCD rather than just any common denominator in adding or subtracting rational expressions?
So that unlike fractions can be converted to like fractions, eg: 1/2 and 1/3 are equvalent to 3/6 and 2/6, 6 being the LCD of 2 and 3. You can now add them (giving 5/6) or subtract the lesser (giving 1/6)
What is the need for complex numbers?
The square of any real number cannot be negative. However, there are equations whose solutions require the square root of negative numbers. The real number system was extended to the set of complex number to allow such operations. In some ways, this is analogous to the set of integers being extended to the set of rational numbers to allow division (when the denominator was not a factor of the numerator), or the set of rational numbers being extended to real numbers to allow square (and other) roots.
