Unless otherwise stated, the "AND" case is normally assumed, i.e., you have to find a solution that satisfies ALL equations.
An AND situation.
When solving an equation, you are looking for a specific answer or answers. However, when solving inequalities, you are only looking for what an answer could be (for example, your answer could be less than 5 or greater than 32).
By looking st two linear equations you can tell that the corresponding lines are parallel when the slope is the same. The slope controls where the line is.
The question truly belongs in the elite, select category.You've neglected to show us both the system of inequalitiesand the list of points that includes the correct one.It's as if I were to ask you: "What am I thinking about thethree people I'm looking at in that crowd ?"
x+y=0 2x+2y=0 This homogeneous system has infinitely many non-trivial solutions. If you are looking for exactly one non-trivial solution, no such system exists. the system may or may not have non trivial solution. if number of variables equal to number of equations and given matrix is non singular then non trivial solution does not exist
There are no disadvantages. There are three main ways to solve linear equations which are: substitution, graphing, and elimination. The method that is most appropriate can be found by looking at the equation.
When solving an equation, you are looking for a specific answer or answers. However, when solving inequalities, you are only looking for what an answer could be (for example, your answer could be less than 5 or greater than 32).
I'm guessing that you're looking at an ordered pair AND a list of equations. Since I can't see either of them, my chances of matching them up are not looking too promising.
It is the single point: -18. =========================== Questions need answers, and equations need solutions. -18 is simply a number. It doesn't ask a question, and it doesn't need a solution. It's like looking for the answer to "purple".
If inequalities exist as a result of social stratifcation.
I suppose Cramer was looking for a generalized method to solve linear systems of equations. Using determinant's was his solution. I've posted a link to a neat site about Cramer's rule.
By looking st two linear equations you can tell that the corresponding lines are parallel when the slope is the same. The slope controls where the line is.
Whether inequality exist
The question truly belongs in the elite, select category.You've neglected to show us both the system of inequalitiesand the list of points that includes the correct one.It's as if I were to ask you: "What am I thinking about thethree people I'm looking at in that crowd ?"
x+y=0 2x+2y=0 This homogeneous system has infinitely many non-trivial solutions. If you are looking for exactly one non-trivial solution, no such system exists. the system may or may not have non trivial solution. if number of variables equal to number of equations and given matrix is non singular then non trivial solution does not exist
It depends on what constitutes different looking: how similar must the equations be before you see that they are the same. If both equations are in the point-slope form, the coefficients of one equation must be a fixed multiple of the coefficients of the other.
A mixture because it can be separated for each other
First of all, that question doesn't make sense. Second of all, you got a situation here. And that situation is how good looking the situation's situation is.