It does not exist.
Proof: Indeed, suppose that this number exists, and denote it by X.
Then X+1 is also a whole number (by definition of the whole numbers). So X cannot be the greatest number since X+1 is even greater, which contradicts the assumption of the first line. The same argument follows for X+1 (compared to X+2), and so on.
Consequently, there is not a greatest whole number.
Remark: One may consider that infinite is the greatest whole number (without such an above contradiction, since infinite+1=infinite), however infinite is not defined to be a whole number.
greatest two digit number is 99. smallest whole number is 0 there fore 99-0=99
What exactly do you mean when you say "the opposite of a whole number" . . .
The square root of 16 is 4 which is a whole number.
it is defined as such.
a fraction cannot be a whole number
Greatest whole number is 259999.
The greatest whole number is 277300.
There is no greatest whole number. If x were the greatest whole number then what about x+1? It would be greater than x and it would be a whole number!
4,999 is the greatest whole number.
The greatest whole number with 5 digits is 99,999. The next greater whole number is 100,000, which is the least whole number having 6 digits.
The least whole number is 1590000 and the greatest number is 1999999
999 is greatest.
the greatest number that is an integer and rational number but is not a natural or whole number is -1
No, 23700 is not the greatest number. Clearly, 23701 is greater and it is also a number.
There is only one whole number in 621860 and that is 621860.
992
Add one to the greatest number you can think of. The answer is either or neither. Whole numbers don't stop.