answersLogoWhite

0

Let's let A=2Z and B=3Z Suppose their is a ring isomorphism from A to B so f:A->B is a ring isomorphism. Then f(2)=3n for some in integer n (1) Now use the ring isomomorphism property that f(a+b)=f(a)+f(b) so f(4)=f(2+2)=f(2)+f(2)=3n+3n using (1) above. Also f(4)=f(2)f(2)=3nx3n=9n^2 But then comparing the two expressions we have for f(4), we obtain 3n+3n=9n^2 but this implies n=0 and we have f(2)=0 (since f(2)=3n for some n as we said above), however, we have f(0)=0 so this is not possible and we must conclude that 2Z is NOT isomorphic to 3Z.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

ProfessorProfessor
I will give you the most educated answer.
Chat with Professor
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why the ring 2Z and 3Z are not isomorphic?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp