Let's let A=2Z and B=3Z Suppose their is a ring isomorphism from A to B so f:A->B is a ring isomorphism. Then f(2)=3n for some in integer n (1) Now use the ring isomomorphism property that f(a+b)=f(a)+f(b) so f(4)=f(2+2)=f(2)+f(2)=3n+3n using (1) above. Also f(4)=f(2)f(2)=3nx3n=9n^2 But then comparing the two expressions we have for f(4), we obtain 3n+3n=9n^2 but this implies n=0 and we have f(2)=0 (since f(2)=3n for some n as we said above), however, we have f(0)=0 so this is not possible and we must conclude that 2Z is NOT isomorphic to 3Z.
Chat with our AI personalities
9y**2-25yz-6z**2Multiply first and last terms9*-6=-54Find factors of -542,-27 = 2+-27=-25-2,27 = -2+27=25Rewrite9y**2-27zy+2zy-6z**2Factor pairs of terms9y**2-27zy = 9y(y-3z)2zy-6z**2= 2z(y-3z)9y**2-27zy+2zy-6z**2= 9y(y-3z)+2z(y-3z)Factor:9y(y-3z)+2z(y-3z) = (y-3z)(9y+2z)
Expand: 8z-4-5z Collect like terms: 3z-4
(-3) x (-2z - 7) = 6z + 21 = 3 (2z + 7)
The ordered triple is (x, y, z) = (1, -1, -2)
wrong quesion