answersLogoWhite

0

Let's let A=2Z and B=3Z Suppose their is a ring isomorphism from A to B so f:A->B is a ring isomorphism. Then f(2)=3n for some in integer n (1) Now use the ring isomomorphism property that f(a+b)=f(a)+f(b) so f(4)=f(2+2)=f(2)+f(2)=3n+3n using (1) above. Also f(4)=f(2)f(2)=3nx3n=9n^2 But then comparing the two expressions we have for f(4), we obtain 3n+3n=9n^2 but this implies n=0 and we have f(2)=0 (since f(2)=3n for some n as we said above), however, we have f(0)=0 so this is not possible and we must conclude that 2Z is NOT isomorphic to 3Z.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why the ring 2Z and 3Z are not isomorphic?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp