No, they are not relatively prime.
No.
No.
Yes. Their only common factor is 1.
The GCF of 21 and 44 is 1. The only proper divisors of 21 are 3 and 7. The only proper divisors of 44 are 2,4 and 11. So, could it be that there are no common factors? No! We forgot about 1 which is a divisor of every number. 1 is the only common factor of 21 and 44, so it has to be the greatest. Rule: if nothing else divides two numbers the greatest common factor is 1. We say such numbers are relatively prime to each other. 21 is relatively prime to 44 and 44 is relatively prime to 21 but neither number is prime. Exercise : Prove : If p and q are two different primes, then p and q are relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, they are not relatively prime.
No, 63 and 74 are not relatively prime because they have a common factor of 1.
Yes, 143 and 63 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
ya they are relatively prime
No.
No, they are not.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
No.
44
30 and 63 are relatively prime numbers. The factors of 30 are 1, 2, 3, 5, and 30, and the factors of 63 are 1, 7, 9, and 63. Two or more numbers are relatively prime if 1 is their only common factor.