answersLogoWhite

0

No, they are not relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the sum of 54 plus 63 as the product of a number and relatively prime addends?

The sum of 54 and 63 is 117. This can be expressed as the product of 9 and 13, where 9 and 13 are relatively prime addends. Therefore, 54 + 63 = 9 × 13.


Are 27 and 117 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Is 72 and 63 relatively prime?

No, they are not relatively prime.


Are 63 and 74 relatively prime?

No, 63 and 74 are not relatively prime because they have a common factor of 1.


Is 143 and 63 relatively prime?

Yes, 143 and 63 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common.


Are 40 and 63 relatively prime numbers?

ya they are relatively prime


Is 56 and 63 relatively prime?

No.


Are 56 and 63 a relatively prime?

No, they are not.


Are 52 and 63 relativly prime?

Yes, they are relatively prime.


Are 7 and 21 relatively prime?

27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.


What are examples of relatively prime numbers?

30 and 63 are relatively prime numbers. The factors of 30 are 1, 2, 3, 5, and 30, and the factors of 63 are 1, 7, 9, and 63. Two or more numbers are relatively prime if 1 is their only common factor.


Is 143 an 63 relatively prime numbers?

Yes.