0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is 56 and 63 relatively prime?
No.
Are 63 and 56 relatively prime?
Yes. Their only common factor is 1.
What pair of numbers is relatively prime 26 and 99 90 and 117 100 and 202 201 and 444?
26 and 99 is the only pair which is relatively prime.
Is 117 prime?
117 is not a prime number. It is divisible by 3. 3*39=117.
Are 44 and 63 relatively prime?
No because they are both composite numbers that have more than two factors.
Are 27 and 117 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Is 72 and 63 relatively prime?
No, they are not relatively prime.
Are 90 and 117 relatively prime?
No, they are not.
Are 63 and 74 relatively prime?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Is 143 and 63 relatively prime?
Yes, 143 and 63 are relatively prime because they have no prime factors in common.
Are 40 and 63 relatively prime numbers?
ya they are relatively prime
Are 56 and 63 a relatively prime?
No, they are not.
Is 56 and 63 relatively prime?
No.
Is 27 and 117 relatively prime?
27 is not a prime number and i dont know about 117 but i dont think its a composite # * * * * * The person who gave the above answer has no understanding of "relative primes". Or primes, for that matter. Neither 8 nor 9 is a prime BUT 8 and 9 are relatively prime (or co-prime) because they have no factor in common. That is what relatively prime means. 117 is not a prime, even if the previous answerer thinks otherwise. 27 and 117 are not relatively prime because both are divisible by 3.
Are 52 and 63 relativly prime?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Are 50 and 63 relatively prime?
Yes.
Are 88 and 63 relatively prime?
Yes.
