0
No, 54 and 165 are not relatively prime.
Wiki User
∙ 8y ago
Dontee Hager
yes
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are 144 and 165 relatively prime numbers?
No, 144 and 165 are not relatively prime. For them to be relatively prime, the number 1 could be their only common factor, but they also have 3 as a common factor.
Is 12 and 54 relatively prime numbers'?
No.
What two numbers are relatively prime to 54?
35 and 49, among others.
What 3 numbers make 165?
54 + 55 + 56 = 165
What are the prime factors of 165?
The prime factors of 165 are 3,5,and 11.3, 5 and 11
Are 56 and 165 relatively prime why?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Are 35 and 54 relatively prime?
Yes, 35 and 54 are relatively prime.
Are 20 88 and 165 relatively prime?
yes, they are relatively prime.
Are 99 and 165 relatively prime?
no
Is 99 and 165 relatively prime?
No
Are 144 and 165 relatively prime numbers?
No, 144 and 165 are not relatively prime. For them to be relatively prime, the number 1 could be their only common factor, but they also have 3 as a common factor.
What is the GCF of 99 and 165 and are they relatively prime?
The GCF is 33, which means they are not relatively prime.
Are 56 and 165 relatively prime?
Yes.
Is 40 relativley prime?
It can be. 40 is relatively prime to 41. 40 is not relatively prime to 54.
Is 144 and 54 relatively prime?
No, two even numbers cannot be relatively prime.
Is 54 and 13 relatively prime?
Yes, they are.
Is 12 and 54 relatively prime numbers'?
No.
