0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 ptsQ: Are 56 and 165 relatively prime?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic
Related questions
Are 56 and 165 relatively prime why?
Yes, they are relatively prime.
Are 54 and 165 relatively prime?
No, 54 and 165 are not relatively prime.
Are 33 and 56 relatively prime?
Yes, 33 and 56 are relatively prime.
Are 20 88 and 165 relatively prime?
yes, they are relatively prime.
Is 7 and 56 relatively prime?
No, 56 is not prime.
Is 99 and 165 relatively prime?
No
Are 99 and 165 relatively prime?
no
Are 144 and 165 relatively prime numbers?
No, 144 and 165 are not relatively prime. For them to be relatively prime, the number 1 could be their only common factor, but they also have 3 as a common factor.
What is the GCF of 99 and 165 and are they relatively prime?
The GCF is 33, which means they are not relatively prime.
What is the greatest common factor of 45 and 56 and are they relatively prime?
Since the GCF of 45 and 56 is 1, they are relatively prime.
Is 56 and 63 relatively prime?
No.
Are 56 and 63 a relatively prime?
No, they are not.
Copyright ©2024 Infospace Holdings LLC, A System1 Company. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Answers.