A "myrillion" is not an actual number, just a made-up name.
In any case, for any number, there are always larger numbers. For example, if you add one to a million, you get a number that is larger than a million. If you choose to define a "myrillion" to be a 1 with so-and-so many zeroes, just add one to it, or add an additional zero, and you get a number that is even larger.
no, bigger numbers are better!
some of the prime numbers bigger than 100:101, 103, 107, 109, 113, 127, 131, 137, 139, 149, 151, 157,...
no, all negative numbers are smaller than positive numbers
Square numbers that are bigger than 600 and smaller than 800 include 625, 676, 729 and 784
It kind of depends. for example, if you had 19.999999999 and that went on forever, then you had 19.99 that stopped then the repeating one would be bigger, however if you had 19.9900000000 instead of 19.99, then the repeating one is not bigger.
The term "myrillion" refers to a quantity equivalent to 10^6 (one million), so "myrillion 30003" can be interpreted as 1,000,000 plus 30,003, resulting in 1,030,003. The numbers that come immediately after it would be 1,030,004, 1,030,005, and so on.
minus myrillion is so small
Decimals occupy the spaces between whole numbers; they are bigger than some, and smaller than some others.
No, 3.5 is bigger than 2.5
184.6 is bigger than the rest of the numbers.
Yes, 34 is a bigger number than 13. It represents more than 13, but in fractions, 13 is a bigger number. 1/13 is bigger than 1/34. So here is the answer: In positive numbers, yes. In fractions, no. In negative numbers, no.
No.
0.01 is 0.007 bigger than 0.003
Do you mean prime factors? If yes, then 143.
19.5 is bigger than 11 as both 19 and 11 are whole numbers.
No, it is never bigger than the smaller number.
No, it is never bigger than the smaller one.