No. That isn't possible: A Prime number, by definition, has no smaller factors. A square number does have a smaller factor - the number that is squared.
Absolutely not. A square number has an integer square root, so by definition it has at least one factor. Prime numbers have no factors
Every square number (except 1) is composite. Prime numbers only have two factors, one and the numbers themselves. Since square numbers also have at least the square roots as factors, they have to be composite.
There are no other prime numbers that are even but 2.
The only even prime number is 2.
They are prime numbers when you reverse the first one, the second one is prime also.
No, there are no prime numbers that are also square numbers. Prime numbers are only divisible by 1 and themselves, while square numbers have integer square roots. Since the square root of a prime number is not an integer, a prime number cannot be a square number.
Square numbers can't be prime. They have too many factors.
Absolutely not. A square number has an integer square root, so by definition it has at least one factor. Prime numbers have no factors
A [perfect] square number, by definition, has a factor which is its square root. As a result it CANNOT be a prime!
i would say no
Every square number (except 1) is composite. Prime numbers only have two factors, one and the numbers themselves. Since square numbers also have at least the square roots as factors, they have to be composite.
I might be reading this incorrectly, but it seems to me that I can take two prime numbers, 3 and 3, and make the square number nine out of them. This is also true of all the other prime numbers.
No, square numbers greater than 1 have more than two factors.
Square numbers, greater than 1, have more than two factors.
Not true. 12 + 22 = 1 + 4 = 5 which is a prime. Or 42 + 52 = 16 + 25 = 41, also a prime.
You don't. All prime numbers are also whole numbers.
There are no other prime numbers that are even but 2.