answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, in the sense that there can be no "highest prime". Here's a simple (though not rigorous) proof.

Suppose there was a highest prime N.

Then N x N' (the next highest prime) x N'' (the next highest prime after that) x ... x 5 x 3 x 2 = some number L. L+1 cannot be divided by N; there would be 1 left over. Similarly, it cannot be divided by any of the other, smaller primes, because there would always be a remainder of 1. L + 1 is therefore a higher prime than N, but we started by assuming there could be a highest prime N. That leads to a contradiction; therefore, there is no highest prime. We don't need to know what L + 1 is exactly, or even what the complete list of primes are, to see that it obviously has to be prime.

(You can try it for small L. For example, 3 x 2 = 6, 6 + 1 = 7, 7 is prime. 5 x 3 x 2 = 30, 30 + 1 = 31, 31 is prime. And so on. Note that this formula doesn't give us every prime; it skips 5, for example, and all the primes between 7 and 31.)

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Do prime number go on forever?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp