This is a rational number 6/2 which when simplified equals 3, which is an integer.
528 is an integer and there is no sensible way to represent it as a mixed fraction.
2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!
Any integer can be expressed as a fraction in its simplest form by putting it over 1.
-2 is an integer and so there is not a sensible way of expressing it as a fraction. One way is -2*k/k where k is an integer.
45 is an integer, not a fraction.
Yes. -6/2 = -3
No because -2/3 is a fraction
Yes. eg: a fraction -4/2 = -2 an integer
528 is an integer and there is no sensible way to represent it as a mixed fraction.
Any integer can be expressed as a fraction by writing it over 1.
14/2 = 7 and is therefore both an integer and rational.
No. The word integer means something that is complete. The word fraction means something that is not whole. So, they are mutually exclusive. However a fraction can represent an integer 3 is the same as 3/1 or 12/4, for example. Every integer can be written as itself over one. So if an integer can be written as a fraction, they are not mutually exclusive. 2 = 2/1 No
It is 2/1 which is, in fact, an integer.
2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!
Any integer can be expressed as a fraction in its simplest form by putting it over 1.
It is a fraction of the form (2*k)/(3*k) where k is any non-zero integer.
-2/3 is not an integer because it is a fraction.