This is a rational number 6/2 which when simplified equals 3, which is an integer.
528 is an integer and there is no sensible way to represent it as a mixed fraction.
2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!
Any integer can be expressed as a fraction in its simplest form by putting it over 1.
-2 is an integer and so there is not a sensible way of expressing it as a fraction. One way is -2*k/k where k is an integer.
An integer is a whole number that can be positive, negative, or zero. In this case, 1 over 2 is a fraction, not an integer, because it is not a whole number. Integers are typically represented as {..., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ...}, while fractions fall between whole numbers.
Yes. eg: a fraction -4/2 = -2 an integer
No because -2/3 is a fraction
Yes. -6/2 = -3
Any integer can be expressed as a fraction by writing it over 1.
14/2 = 7 and is therefore both an integer and rational.
528 is an integer and there is no sensible way to represent it as a mixed fraction.
No. The word integer means something that is complete. The word fraction means something that is not whole. So, they are mutually exclusive. However a fraction can represent an integer 3 is the same as 3/1 or 12/4, for example. Every integer can be written as itself over one. So if an integer can be written as a fraction, they are not mutually exclusive. 2 = 2/1 No
It is 2/1 which is, in fact, an integer.
2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!2/3 of 3 = 3*2/3 = 2 which is an integer, not a fraction!
Any integer can be expressed as a fraction in its simplest form by putting it over 1.
It is a fraction of the form (2*k)/(3*k) where k is any non-zero integer.
-2/3 is not an integer because it is a fraction.