It is already expressed as a whole number in the form of 3150
4 over 5 is not a whole number and so it cannot be expressed as a whole number.
104 is already expressed as a whole number
It can't be expessed as a whole number but as a fraction in its simplest form it is: 7/20
7.25
7.3333 is a mixed number in decimal form and there is no sensible way to represent it as a whole number. The whole part of it is 7.
440 is, itself, a whole number and, because it is a whole number, it is in its simplest form.
589 is a whole number and it is in its simplest form.
It is a whole number and its simplest form is 253.
The whole number equivalent of .99 is 0, as the decimal portion is less than 0.5. When converting a decimal to a whole number, you typically round down to the nearest whole number if the decimal portion is less than 0.5. Therefore, .99 as a whole number is 0.
It is a whole number and the simplest form is 33.
A whole number is in its simplest form: it cannot be simplified further.
138 is already a whole number in simplest form.
It is already a whole number in the form of 12492
A whole number is a number is a rational number which, in its simplest form has 1 as divisor. All other numbers are not whole number.
No.16 = 16/1 which is of the form of 'one whole number' over 'another whole number' which is the form of a rational number.
The standard form of a whole number is when a whole number is written in digits with commas separating the digits into groups of three starting from right to left