With a lot of elbow grease, we learned something that we don't understand yet:
All of them can, except the powers of two ... 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 .
So the answer is 93 . We need to think about this peculiar discovery.
An integer is a whole number. The set of integers can be expressed as {-∞, ..., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., ∞}. The ∞ symbol represents infinity (an integer with infinite digits). The integer zero (0) lies at the centre of the set and is neither positive nor negative. The positive integers are the counting numbers greater than zero {1, 2, 3, ..., ∞}. The negative integers are the inverses of the counting numbers, all less than zero {-∞, ..., -3, -2, -1}. Positive integers are sometimes denoted with the + symbol for clarity, such as {+1, +2, +3, ..., +∞).Positive integers are the counting numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and so on) greater than zero. Negative integers are their counterparts (-1, -2, -3, -4, -5 and so on) less than zero.
0.57 can be written as 57/100. 57 and 100 are both integers and therefore 0.57 can be written as a ratio of 2 integers. A number that can be written as a ratio of two integers is a rational number because the word rational comes from ratio.
There are 19 two-digit positive integers greater than 60. 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, 96, 98 Edit: Since you didn't specify greater than 60 up to 100, the answer to your question as written is infinite.
NO it is not irrational, that is to say it IS rational. If you can write a number as ratio of integers, it is rational. -11.7 can certainly be written as a ratio of integers.
Rational
All of them from 45 to 99 ... 55 integers.
The answer is, obviously, 9.
3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13 ... and the rest of the odds, up to 39
No. Odd numbers can be written as the sum of consecutive integers, but some multiples of odd numbers are even.
The first 4 consecutive integers can be written as the following:XX+1X+2X+3From the problem the we get the following equation:2*(X)*(X+3) - {(X)*(X+3)} = 42X2+6X - X2 - 3X = 4X2 + 3X - 4 = 0Factoring this quadratic equation is (X+4)(X-1) = 0So the 1st positive integer is X-1 = 0 or X=1and the other integers is 2,3,4----Comment by Kirbysuper----But... those integers aren't positive numbers... in the question, it says to find 4 consecutive positiveintegers.
Integers are the natural numbers (positive and negative) that can be written without a decimal or a fraction attached.see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer
Let x equal the smallest integer. The sum will be 3x + 6
All atomic numbers are positive integers. Strontium's atomic number is 38.
Many numbers can be expressed as the sum of two or more consecutive integers. For example, the number 15 can be written as the sum of consecutive integers in three different ways: 15=7+8 15=4+5+6 15=1+2+3+4+5 Look at numbers other than 15 and find out all you can about writing them as sums of consecutive whole numbers.
There are 8*8 = 64 such numbers.
Positive integers are all the whole numbers greater than zero: 1, 2, 3, 4,5,... and negative integers are-1.-2,-3.-4,-5,.... The integers are the union of the positive integers, the negative integers and 0. Integers are numbers that can be written without a fractional or decimal component, and fall within the set {... −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, ...}. A third definition is the integers are the union of the natural numbers, their negatives, and 0.
All positive integers have an exponential form. For example, 43 can also be written as 431.