1,409,836 rounded to the nearest thousand is 1,410,000.
The nearest thousand is 2000, so it would round up to that.
When rounding 90,000 to the nearest thousand, you look at the hundreds place, which is 0 in this case. Since 0 is less than 5, you would round down to the nearest thousand. Therefore, 90,000 rounded to the nearest thousand is 90,000.
It would round up to 600,000.
The wording of this question seems confusing. 5700 rounded to the nearest thousand would be 6000. So you appear to be looking for the largest and smallest whole numbers that would round to 6000.The smallest whole number that would round to 6000 would be 5500. 5499 if rounded to the nearest thousand would be 5000.The largest whole number that would round to 6000 would be 6499. 6500 if rounded to the nearest thousand would be 7000.
already is rounded to the nearest thousand if nearest ten thousand it would be 12420000
Well, considering it would have to be at least 500 to round up to the nearest thousand, I suppose the answer would be 0.
1,409,836 rounded to the nearest thousand is 1,410,000.
You would round it down to 49000.
459 to the nearest ten thousand? (not thousandth?) 459 would round down to 0..
To the nearest thousandth, 265.588 To the nearest thousand, zero.
To round 472992 to the nearest ten thousand, you would look at the digit in the ten thousand place, which is 9. Since 9 is greater than 5, you would round up. Therefore, 472992 rounded to the nearest ten thousand would be 480000.
5000
The nearest thousand is 2000, so it would round up to that.
If to the nearest thousand, yes.If to the nearest 500, no.
No number if rounded to the nearest thousand would round to 3600. If you had to round the number 3600 to the nearest thousand, it would be approximately equal to 4000.
6215446 rounded to the nearest thousand would be 6215000.