No, it is not a natural number. It is not a whole, positive integer.
It is a negative whole number which is the same as an integer
-13 is rational and an integer.
the greatest number that is an integer and rational number but is not a natural or whole number is -1
All integers are whole numbers. The natural numbers are zero and the positive integers. Thus, any negative integer (-1, -2, -3, etc.) is whole but not "natural."
A negative integer is a whole number but not a natural number.
No, it is not a natural number. It is not a whole, positive integer.
3.5 is real, rational, and natural. It's not irrational, integer, or whole.
A whole number is one without a decimal or fraction, and a natural number is any positive integer, so this is both a whole number and an integer.
The square root of 25 is 5, which is a whole number, an integer, a natural number and a rational number.
It is a whole number.
Every whole number is rational and an integer. But the "natural" numbers are definedas the counting numbers, so the negative whole numbers wouldn't qualify.No and yes: it is not a natural number but it is a rational number.
It is rational, whole, integer and real but not natural nor irrational.
Rational, whole and integer. Some mathematicians consider it a natural number, others do not.
5 is a natural number, as it is an integer greater than zero. It is a whole number, an integer, and a rational number.
Every natural number satisfies the requirements.
3 is natural number, a whole number, an integer, a terminating decimal, and a rational number. It is not an irrational number.