answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It is the smallest non-negative rational number. Negative numbers are rational and are smaller.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is 0 is the smallest rational number?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the smallest number by which root 5 - root 3 be multiplied to make it a rational number Also find the number obtained?

2


Is there a smallest positive rational number?

1/infinity? * * * * * Nice idea but unfortunately that is not a rational number, which is defined as the ration of two integers, x/y where y > 0. Since infinity is not an integer, the suggested ratio is not a rational number. The correct answer is that there is no such number. If any number laid claim to being the smallest positive rational, then half of that number would have a better claim. And then a half of THAT number would be a positive rational that was smaller still. And so on.


Is 0 a rational number answer?

Yes.All integers are rational numbers.0 is an integer.Therefore, 0 is a rational number.


Which is the smallest rational number?

1


Is 0 rational?

0 Is a rational number


Is 0 over 3 a rational number?

Yes, 0/3 is 0 which is a rational number


Is 0 a rational or irrational number?

Zero (0) is a rational number, because it is a whole number and an integer.


An example of a rational number?

Zero (0) is a rational number.


Can you multiply an irrational number and a rational number to get a rational number?

Yes, but only if the rational number is 0.


Can a rational number be multiplied by an irrational number and equal a rational number?

Only if the rational number is 0.


Does a rational number times an irrational number equal a rational number?

No. If the rational number is not zero, then such a product is irrational.


What is smallest rational number?

There is no such number. If any number laid claim to being the smallest rational number its claim could be challenged by half that number - which would also be rational and, obviously smaller. And the claim of that number could be challenged by half that number, and so on.