No 100 is not a reasonable estimate
No it is not. 88.22 times 100 is 8822 which is nowhere near 915.25!
The closest estimate is the exact answer. For any other estimate, you can do better with more effort.150*83 = approx 100*3/2*82 = 100*3*41 = 100*3*40 = 12000.
100 x 16 = 1600
To the nearest 100 it is 700
106.1667
No it is not. 88.22 times 100 is 8822 which is nowhere near 915.25!
1000 quarters
25 * 4 = 100 seems reasonable. The exact answer is 102.59
Oh honey, 100 is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine when it comes to estimating 915.25 and 88.22. Let's get real here - add those two numbers up and you're looking at 1003.47. So no, 100 is not a reasonable estimate. Try again, sweetie.
If you added two numbers and got the right total, you didn't need an estimate, reasonable or not.
The Austin Otis Spunkmeyer plant is located at 6301 E Stassney Ln # 7-100 Austin, TX 78744 (512) 385-8822
is 0.018 a reasonble answer for 1.8 times 100
No. When multiplying by a positive number greater than 1 the number will get bigger. 0.018 is less than 1.8 so cannot be a reasonable answer to 1.8 × 100. 1.8 × 100 = 180. 1.8 ÷ 100 = 0.018.
5*5*4 = about 100 cm3
100 uSD
Not if owner can be located by reasonable means.
If there are 150 blueberries in a 100 gram carton, then each blueberry would have a mass of about 0.666 grams. That is a reasonable mass for a blueberry, so yes, it is reasonable that there are 150 blueberries in Julio's carton.