How about 450
7 x 11 = 77 400/77 = 5.19.... ==> 5 integers
420, 480, 540
100% of 1900= 190030% of 1900=xx=(30)(1900)/100x=570.----30% of 1900=570.
No. 189 is only evenly divisible by 3 and 9 (from the set provided). Using the following rules of divisibility on the number 189: Divisible by 2? No - the number is not even Divisible by 3? Yes - the sum of the digits (1 + 8 + 9 = 18) is divisible by 3 Divisible by 4? No - the last two digits are not evenly divisible by 4 Divisible by 5? No - the last digit is not a 0 or a 5 Divisible by 6? No - the number is not even Divisible by 9? Yes - the sum of the digits is divisible by 9 Divisible by 10? No - the number is not divisible by 2 or 5
Definitely it were 28 days .As 1900 is not divisible by 400
Although divisible by 4 and by 100, it was not divisible by 400, so 1900 was not a leap year and therefore had 365 days.
1900 was not a leap year because it's evenly divisible by 100 but not evenly divisible by 400.
All years divisible by 4 are leap years. Exceptions occur at the end of century: if the year is divisible by 100, it is not a leap year, unless it is also divisible by 400. Thus, 1700, 1800, 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 were leap years.All years divisible by 4 are leap years. Exceptions occur at the end of century: if the year is divisible by 100, it is not a leap year, unless it is also divisible by 400. Thus, 1700, 1800, 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 were leap years.All years divisible by 4 are leap years. Exceptions occur at the end of century: if the year is divisible by 100, it is not a leap year, unless it is also divisible by 400. Thus, 1700, 1800, 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 were leap years.All years divisible by 4 are leap years. Exceptions occur at the end of century: if the year is divisible by 100, it is not a leap year, unless it is also divisible by 400. Thus, 1700, 1800, 1900 were not leap years, but 1600 and 2000 were leap years.
The most recent non-leap year that was divisible by 4 was in the year 1900. The next one will be the year 2100. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_year
yes, because 1896 is evenly divisible by 4 and not evenly divisible by 100 Note that 1896 is the last leap year of the 19th century, since 1900, the last year of the 19th century, is not a leap year because, although 1900 is evenly divisible by 4, it is also evenly divisible by 100 and not evenly divisible by 400.
=every 4 years==_______________________________________==According to the Gregorian calendar, leap years occur in any year whose number is divisible by four, except:==1. "Century" years, numbers divisible by 100, are NOT leap years, except;==2. Year numbers that are evenly divisible by 400 ARE leap years.==So 1992 and 1996 were leap years because they are divisible by 4. 1900 was NOT a leap year even though it is divisible by 4, because it is divisible by 100. And 2000 WAS a leap year because it was divisible by 400.==So 2008 was, and 2012 will be, and 2016 will be. But the year 2100 will NOT be a leap year.=
No. The year is a leap year if it is divisible by 4. However, it is divisible by 100, it must also be divisible by 400 to be a leap year. For example, 2000 was a leap year, but 1900 was not.
The following are not leap years in the Gregorian calendar:year numbers that are not evenly divisible by 4, like 2009, 2010 and 2011year numbers that are evenly divisible by 100 but not evenly divisible by 400, like 1900 and 2100
1900 is the only not leap year;; bcz leap year should satisfy following condition: i)it should divisible by either 4 or 400 ii)it should not divisible 100 (except those years ending with 00,but de must divisible by 4) ex:2000 is leap year(ending with 00,and also divisible by 4) 1900 is not a leap year(ending with 00,but not divisible by 4) tank u,,
No - 1900/400 = 4.75
Yes - the previous multiple of 4, 1900, as a year divisible by 100, would also require to be divisible by 400 in order to be a leap year - which it is not. While 2000 is divisible by 400, 2100, 2200 and 2300 are not, and therefore none of those three will be a leap year. 1900 was also the last year of the 19t century, so 1904 would've been the first leap year ever of the 20th century regardless if 1900 was a leap year or not. Even if 1900 was a triple leap year because it was divisible by 475, anything else would've been ignored by the time 1905 came.