No, one half which is 1/2 is not a integer. Its a rational number.
The denominator can be any even integer. In the equivalent fraction, the numerator would be 129 times half that integer.
Perhaps it makes sense to ask; in any case, the answer is that there is no greatest and no smallest integer. Whatever number you choose, you can always add one to get an even larger integer; or subtract one to get an even smaller one.
No. To be a rational number it must be an integer over another integer. π is not an integer, nor can it be made into an integer by multiplying it by another integer, thus one twelfth of π is not a rational number.
Yes 61 is an integer and it also is a prime number because it has only two factors which are itself and one
No.
Not at all. Six times one half is three, and one half is not an integer.
No, to be an integer it would have to be a whole number.
You end up with an integer and a fraction. The integer is half of (one less than the one you started with), and the fraction is a half.
No because an integer is a whole number without fractions or decimals
One-half is rational because it can be expressed as a quotient of two integers (one divided by two).
No. An integer has to be a whole number.
The number -1/2 is a rational number, a negative integer divided by a positive integer.
1/2
2 half of 3 is just 3 and yes it is an integer
No.
No.
One half = 1/2.Multiply the numerator (top) and the denominator (bottom) of the fraction by any non-zero integer. You will have an equivalent fraction.One half = 1/2.Multiply the numerator (top) and the denominator (bottom) of the fraction by any non-zero integer. You will have an equivalent fraction.One half = 1/2.Multiply the numerator (top) and the denominator (bottom) of the fraction by any non-zero integer. You will have an equivalent fraction.One half = 1/2.Multiply the numerator (top) and the denominator (bottom) of the fraction by any non-zero integer. You will have an equivalent fraction.