Yes. A rational number is one which can be expressed as one integer over another integer. 656.95 = 65695/100000 which is of the form of one integer over another one; thus it is a rational number.
NO, it is a rational number but NOT an integer.
A rational number is one that can be expressed as one integer (whole number) over another integer. 4.89 = 489 ÷ 100 = 489/100 In this form 489 is an integer and 100 is an integer, so 4.89 can be expressed as one integer over another integer, thus it is a rational number.
No. An irrational number is one that is not a rational number. A rational number is once that equals one integer divided by another. So an irrational number cannot be represented by one integer divided by another integer, so it cannot be an integer!
-42 is rational. All integers are rational numbers as they can be expressed as the number over 1 which, being one integer over another integer, is the form of a rational number.
No, one half which is 1/2 is not a integer. Its a rational number.
The number -1/2 is a rational number, a negative integer divided by a positive integer.
Yes. A rational number is one which can be expressed as one integer over another integer. 656.95 = 65695/100000 which is of the form of one integer over another one; thus it is a rational number.
NO, it is a rational number but NOT an integer.
-1 is all of an integer, a whole number, and a rational number.
A rational number is one that can be expressed as one integer (whole number) over another integer. 4.89 = 489 ÷ 100 = 489/100 In this form 489 is an integer and 100 is an integer, so 4.89 can be expressed as one integer over another integer, thus it is a rational number.
No. To be a rational number it must be an integer over another integer. π is not an integer, nor can it be made into an integer by multiplying it by another integer, thus one twelfth of π is not a rational number.
No. An irrational number is any number that is not a rational number; A rational number is any number that can be expressed as one integer over another integer. negative 3 over 4 is one integer (negative 3) over another integer (4), and so is a rational number.
A rational number is one which can be expressed as one integer over another (possibly the same) integer which is not zero. thirty thirds = 30/3 which is one integer over another integer → it is rational.
372 = 1,369 is an integer; therefore, it is a rational number. In fact, the square of any integer is always an integer; this is because the sum or product of any two integers is an integer. And every integer is a rational number; this is because a rational number is defined as the quotient obtained by dividing one integer into another; and because every integer is the quotient obtained by dividing that integer by the integer 1.
No. An irrational number is one that is not a rational number. A rational number is once that equals one integer divided by another. So an irrational number cannot be represented by one integer divided by another integer, so it cannot be an integer!
It is a number that can be expressed as a fraction but is NOT an integer. For example. 3 is an integer and it is rational since we can write 3/1, but 1/3 is not an integer and it is rational since we wrote it as a fraction or a ratio. Remember that a rational number is one that can be written as A/B where A and B are integers. Now if B is 1, which is certainly an integer, A/1 is rational but since A is an integer, A/1 is an integer.