No, it is irrational. Here is the proof:
Let's start out with the basic inequality 4 < 8 < 9.
Now, we'll take the square root of this inequality:
2 < √8 < 3.
If you subtract all numbers by 2, you get:
0 < √8 - 2 < 1.
If √8 is rational, then it can be expressed as a fraction of two integers, m/n. This next part is the only remotely tricky part of this proof, so pay attention. We're going to assume that m/n is in its most reduced form; i.e., that the value for n is the smallest it can be and still be able to represent √8. Therefore, √8n must be an integer, and n must be the smallest multiple of √8 to make this true. If you don't understand this part, read it again, because this is the heart of the proof.
Now, we're going to multiply √8n by (√8 - 2). This gives 8n - 2√8n. Well, 8n is an integer, and, as we explained above, √8n is also an integer; therefore, 8n - 2√8n is an integer as well. We're going to rearrange this expression to (√8n - 2n)√8 and then set the term (√8n - 2n) equal to p, for simplicity. This gives us the expression √8p, which is equal to 8n - 2√8n, and is an integer.
Remember, from above, that 0 < √8 - 2 < 1.
If we multiply this inequality by n, we get 0 < √8n - 2n < n, or, from what we defined above, 0 < p < n. This means that p < n and thus √8p < √8n. We've already determined that both √8p and √8n are integers, but recall that we said n was the smallest multiple of √8 to yield an integer value. Thus, √8p < √8n is a contradiction; therefore √8 can't be rational and so must be irrational.
Q.E.D.
No, in fact unless an integer has an integral square root, the square root is always irrational. Note that some rational fractions can have rational square roots, though. Example: sqrt(4/9) = sqrt(4)/sqrt(9) = 2/3, which is rational. Or sqrt(9/16) = 3/4
The square of a negative number is always positive. The square of -8 = 64, a rational number
A square root is considered a rational number if the number inside the square root sign is a perfect square. In other words, if the square root of a number results in a whole number, then it is a rational number. For example, the square root of 9 is 3, which is a whole number, making it a rational number. However, if the square root results in a non-terminating, non-repeating decimal, then it is considered an irrational number.
No. Square roots of whole numbers that don't result in whole numbers (e.g. the square root of 64 is 8), are considered to be "irrational numbers".
Square root of 59 is 7.681145748 Nearest whole number would be 8
The square root of 64 is 8 which is a rational number
It is a rational number because the square root of 64 is 8 which is a rational number
No, they are not.
The square root of 64 is 8, which is a rational number.
irrational
The square root of 64 is 8 which is a rational number
It is an irrational number
yes
The square root of 8 is irrational and real.
Rational. It is a perfect square with answer exactly 8The square root of 64 is the integer 8 (8 x 8 = 64) so it is rational.
The square root of 8 over 25 is irrational, and real.
no! the square root of 8 is not retional but the cube root is retional