No because natural numbers are a subset of real numbers
Integers are a subset of rational numbers which are a subset of real numbers which are a subset of complex numbers ...
The complex numbers.
No. But all whole numbers are in the set of rational numbers. Natural numbers (ℕ) are a subset of Integers (ℤ), which are a subset of Rational numbers (ℚ), which are a subset of Real numbers (ℝ),which is a subset of the Complex numbers (ℂ).
No. There are several real numbers that are not rational (e.g. pi). However, every rational number is also a real number. In general, whole numbers/natural numbers is a subset of the integers (i.e. every whole number is an integer), the integers is a subset of the rationals, the rationals are a subset of the real numbers. I think the real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers, but I'm not 100% positive on that.
No because natural numbers are a subset of real numbers
You have it backwards. Integers are a subset of real numbers.
Integers are a subset of rational numbers which are a subset of real numbers which are a subset of complex numbers ...
The real numbers, themselves. Every set is a subset of itself.
Imaginary numbers are not a subset of the real numbers; imaginary means not real.
Starting at the top, we have the real numbers. The rational numbers is a subset of the reals. So are the irrational numbers. Now some rationals are integers so that is a subset of the rationals. Then a subset of the integers is the whole numbers. The natural numbers is a subset of those.
The set of Rational Numbers is a [proper] subset of Real Numbers.
No. Natural numbers are a proper subset of real numbers.
The natural numbers (ℕ) are a subset of the integers (ℤ) which are a subset of the rational numbers (ℚ) which are a subset of the real numbers (ℝ): ℕ ⊂ ℤ ⊂ ℚ ⊂ ℝ → ℕ ⊂ ℝ and ℤ ⊂ ℝ as well as ℚ ⊂ ℝ
Natural numbers are a subset of the set of integers, among others.
Irrational Numbers which are a subset of Real Numbers which are a subset of Complex Numbers ...
The complex numbers.