Well, darling, a whole number that is greater than 0 is any positive integer. So basically, any number without decimals or fractions that is bigger than zero fits the bill. Hope that clears things up for you, sugar!
No because natural number are whole numbers greater than 0
Numbers that are positive and whole. Natural numbers.
no 0.23 is not grater than 0 because 0 is considered a whole number and 0.23 is just a fraction of a number. P.S. I am only 10 and I know the answer to that question.
No. Whatever multiple of the number you think might be the limit, you can always add the whole number again and have a larger multiple.
2, if you're considering only positive numbers (numbers greater than 0) 0, if you're considering only non-negative numbers (numbers greater than or equal to 0) If negative numbers are allowed, then there is no smallest even number
a digit
' x ' = any whole number greater than ' 2 '.
No because natural number are whole numbers greater than 0
0
Numbers that are positive and whole. Natural numbers.
The set of whole numbers includes all numbers greater than 0 that do not require decimals to be expressed. Because -16 is less than 0, it is not a whole number. It is an integer.
This is true.
No because natural numbers are whole numbers greater than 0
the sum of two whole numbers is always greater than either addend* * * * *No.Consider:5 is a whole number-3 is a whole number.Their sum is 2, which is notgreater than one of the addends (5).
no 0.23 is not grater than 0 because 0 is considered a whole number and 0.23 is just a fraction of a number. P.S. I am only 10 and I know the answer to that question.
No because counting numbers are positive whole numbers greater than 0
numbers greater than 0 are called positive numbers