No because natural number are whole numbers greater than 0
Numbers that are positive and whole. Natural numbers.
no 0.23 is not grater than 0 because 0 is considered a whole number and 0.23 is just a fraction of a number. P.S. I am only 10 and I know the answer to that question.
No. Whatever multiple of the number you think might be the limit, you can always add the whole number again and have a larger multiple.
2, if you're considering only positive numbers (numbers greater than 0) 0, if you're considering only non-negative numbers (numbers greater than or equal to 0) If negative numbers are allowed, then there is no smallest even number
a digit
' x ' = any whole number greater than ' 2 '.
No because natural number are whole numbers greater than 0
0
Numbers that are positive and whole. Natural numbers.
The set of whole numbers includes all numbers greater than 0 that do not require decimals to be expressed. Because -16 is less than 0, it is not a whole number. It is an integer.
No because natural numbers are whole numbers greater than 0
This is true.
the sum of two whole numbers is always greater than either addend* * * * *No.Consider:5 is a whole number-3 is a whole number.Their sum is 2, which is notgreater than one of the addends (5).
no 0.23 is not grater than 0 because 0 is considered a whole number and 0.23 is just a fraction of a number. P.S. I am only 10 and I know the answer to that question.
No because counting numbers are positive whole numbers greater than 0
generally we think of fractions as being rational numbers between 0 and 1, thus all whole numbers other than zero will be greater than a fraction.