0
What else can I help you with?
Is 2700 a good estimate for 903 times 9?
No
What is a good estimate for 288 times 9?
I suggest 290*9 = 290*(10-1) = 2900 - 290 = 2900 - 300 = 2600The exact answer is 2592.
What is a good good estimate for 11 times 351?
10 times 351 = 3510 The real answer will be 351 more than that. Estimate 3861
Is 3 a good estimate for 3.4 times 0.09?
No, 3 is not a good estimate for 3.4 times 0.09. To estimate the product of 3.4 and 0.09, you can round each number to the nearest whole number, which would be 3 and 0 respectively. Multiplying 3 by 0 gives you 0, which is significantly different from the actual product of 3.4 times 0.09, which is 0.306.
What is a good estimate for 0.5 x 0.7?
0.35
Is 2700 a good estimate for 903 times 9?
No
Why would you want your estimate to be greater than your actual answer?
There is no good reason. There are times when you would and times when you would not.
Why is 2700 is not a good estimate for 903 times 29?
It's off by an order of magnitude. Should be near 27,000, not 2,700. Checking now... it's 26,187, to be precise.
What is a good estimate for 288 times 9?
I suggest 290*9 = 290*(10-1) = 2900 - 290 = 2900 - 300 = 2600The exact answer is 2592.
What is a good good estimate for 11 times 351?
10 times 351 = 3510 The real answer will be 351 more than that. Estimate 3861
Give one good reason why 2800 is not a good estimate for 702 x 43?
the answer would have had 5 digits
What is a good estimate for 2745 times 6.9?
21,000
What is the cost of the classified in btd3?
2700 Bloons Its pricey but Good :)
Why is 2 not a good estimate for 13.68 times 0.04?
The answer being 0.5456, the digit 2 can not be a good estimate since it is not close.
What is 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 times 400000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000?
A good reason to learn scientific notation.
Is 4 a good estimate for 158 41?
If I assume that you're talking about 158 / 41 then my quick answer is yes, it is a good estimate. 4 times 41 is 164 which is closer to 158 than 3 times 41 (123) and 5 times 41 (205). Final summary: 4 is a good estimate for 158 / 41 because it is the closest whole number to the real answer.
Is 3 a good estimate for 3.4 times 0.09?
No, 3 is not a good estimate for 3.4 times 0.09. To estimate the product of 3.4 and 0.09, you can round each number to the nearest whole number, which would be 3 and 0 respectively. Multiplying 3 by 0 gives you 0, which is significantly different from the actual product of 3.4 times 0.09, which is 0.306.
