12.7 - 0.1 = 12.6
Since 0.5 is a fraction whose absolute value is less than one, it does cannot be represented properly as a mixed number. However, if pushed, I suggest 0.5 = 01/2
0.074 is 0.064 bigger than 0.01
In the context of decimal numbers, 8.54 is less than 8.55. This is because numbers to the right of the decimal point are in the tenths place, so 8.54 is 1/100 less than 8.55. In other words, 8.55 is one hundredth greater than 8.54.
No.
Ndc 0517-0720-01
The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6
decimal point to the left of the whole number. Example: 1= whole number. Less than 1 as a decimal is .00, .01, 02 etc.
4.01 is less than 4.2. When comparing two numbers, the first step is to look at the whole number part, which in this case is 4. Since they have the same whole number part, we then move on to the decimal part. In this case, 01 is less than 2, so 4.01 is less than 4.2.
No because .021 is greater than .01
Less than Perfect was created on 2002-10-01.
Without a decimal point, they are both the same. If you asked "Which is less .01 or .001", then .001 is the smaller number.
.01
Less Than Human - novel - was created on 2004-10-01.
1
Simplest . . . 1/9Mixed number . . . not possible, because 8/72 is less than ' 1 '.If you absolutely must have a mixed number, then it's 01/9 .
Since 0.5 is a fraction whose absolute value is less than one, it does cannot be represented properly as a mixed number. However, if pushed, I suggest 0.5 = 01/2
0.09000000000000001