Less than, 8.54 is .01 less than 8.55
Since 0.5 is a fraction whose absolute value is less than one, it does cannot be represented properly as a mixed number. However, if pushed, I suggest 0.5 = 01/2
0.074 is 0.064 bigger than 0.01
Ndc 0517-0720-01
No.
The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6The fraction has an absolute value of less than 1 and so does not really have a mixed number form. But, if pushed, you could go for 01/6
decimal point to the left of the whole number. Example: 1= whole number. Less than 1 as a decimal is .00, .01, 02 etc.
Less than, 8.54 is .01 less than 8.55
No because .021 is greater than .01
Less than Perfect was created on 2002-10-01.
Without a decimal point, they are both the same. If you asked "Which is less .01 or .001", then .001 is the smaller number.
.01
Less Than Human - novel - was created on 2004-10-01.
Less than .01%.
1
Simplest . . . 1/9Mixed number . . . not possible, because 8/72 is less than ' 1 '.If you absolutely must have a mixed number, then it's 01/9 .
Since 0.5 is a fraction whose absolute value is less than one, it does cannot be represented properly as a mixed number. However, if pushed, I suggest 0.5 = 01/2