No. Not even close. Examples: 4+4=8 8+8=16 16+16=32 . . .4, 8, and 16 are not prime numbers.
3 and 13 or 5 and 11
16 and 12 how did you get it
16 and 24
That's a false statement. Both 16 and 64 have one prime factor. 16 can't be the LCM of two prime numbers and 64 can't be the product. If you leave out the word prime, you can use 16 and 4.
16prime + prime = (sum) sum is 16or13 + 3 =16
There are no such numbers.
How about: 13+3 = 16
No. Not even close. Examples: 4+4=8 8+8=16 16+16=32 . . .4, 8, and 16 are not prime numbers.
The sum of all prime numbers between 10 and 16 is 41.
The two numbers that have a product of -240 and a sum of 1 are 16 and -15. This is because 16 multiplied by -15 equals -240, and 16 added to -15 equals 1. These two numbers satisfy both conditions simultaneously.
3 and 13 or 5 and 11
13+3=16
16
11 and 5 13 and 3
Not true. 12 + 22 = 1 + 4 = 5 which is a prime. Or 42 + 52 = 16 + 25 = 41, also a prime.
The two numbers whose sum is 58 and whose difference is 16 are 21 and 37.