Study guides

☆☆

Q: Which set represent the integers

Write your answer...

Submit

Still have questions?

Continue Learning about Basic Math

There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.

The set of positive odd integers.

The set of Counting Numbers or Natural Numbersincludes positive integers but not negative integers or zero.The set is 1,2,3,4,5,6....and so on.

Integers include negative numbers.

Yes. Integers are just rational numbers of the form a/1.

Related questions

Any set with fewer than or more than 20 distinct elements cannot represent the set of integers from 1 to 20.

Concentric circles. The set of whole numbers is a subset of the set of integers and both of them are subsets of the set of rational numbers.

Concentric circles. The set of whole numbers is a subset of the set of integers and both of them are subsets of the set of rational numbers.

The set of integers is an infinite set as there are an infinite number of integers.

If the exponents are associated with non-integers, or if the exponents are non-integers, it is very likely that the expression does not represent integers.If the exponents are associated with non-integers, or if the exponents are non-integers, it is very likely that the expression does not represent integers.If the exponents are associated with non-integers, or if the exponents are non-integers, it is very likely that the expression does not represent integers.If the exponents are associated with non-integers, or if the exponents are non-integers, it is very likely that the expression does not represent integers.

It is Z, except that the font used is not one of the standard ones.

Whole numbers and integers are identical sets. Both are proper subsets of rational numbers.If Z is the set of all integers, and Z+ the set of all positive integers then Q, the set of all rational numbers, is equivalent to the Cartesian product of Z and Z+.

Here is that set. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) Choose whatever doesn't represent that.

There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.There is no such thing as a negative set of integers. There can be a set of negative integers, but that is not the same thing. And even that does not make sense.

Whatever linked is, I don't think it can be used to represent long integers.

There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.There are more real numbers than integers. The set of integers is countably infinite, of magnitude aleph-zero. The set of real numbers is uncountably infinite (specifically, aleph-one).A computer can't really represent real numbers (that would require an infinite amount of memory), rather, it uses an approximation.

The answer depends on what set of integers is under consideration.The answer depends on what set of integers is under consideration.The answer depends on what set of integers is under consideration.The answer depends on what set of integers is under consideration.

People also asked